Skip to content

Adjusted High-dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Stem Cell Transplant vs. Conventional Immunochemotherapy in Elderly PCNSL Patients

Age-adjusted High-dose Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation or Conventional Chemotherapy With R-MP as First-line Treatment in Elderly Primary CNS Lymphoma Patients - a Randomized Phase III Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06830421
Acronym
PRIMA-CNS
Enrollment
340
Registered
2025-02-17
Start date
2023-08-09
Completion date
2031-08-31
Last updated
2025-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Keywords

Primary central nervous system lymphoma, HD-chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation, Age-adjusted HCT-ASCT, First-line treatment in elderly PCNSL patients, HD-MTX induction

Brief summary

Most patients being diagnosed with primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system (PCNSL) are 60 years or older. Elderly patients with PCNSL have a poor prognosis and there is a great medical need to improve outcome for this vulnerable population. In Germany and many international centres, there are currently two widely used strategies to treat elderly PCNSL patients who are eligible for high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) treatment, which have not yet been compared head-to-head. The R-MP regimen has been established by the Cooperative PCNSL Study Group as a conventional immunochemotherapy standard treatment for elderly patients with newly diagnosed disease and consists of Rituximab, HD-MTX and Procarbazine followed by maintenance therapy with Procarbazine. In contrast, another recently established protocol also includes HD-MTX-based induction therapy, but followed by consolidating high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT). This is an overall more intensive, but substantially shorter treatment approach, feasible for elderly patients being considered eligible for a more intensive treatment. The PRIMA-CNS trial aims to compare these two treatment approaches with respect to survival, response rates and toxicity.

Detailed description

Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system (PCNSL) is a rare lymphoma affecting only the central nervous system compartment. PCNSL patients are typically 60 years or older and have poor prognoses. However, there are alternative treatment approaches to consider with the potential to improve medical outcomes for this patient population. The current standard of care in Germany and many international centres for patients 65 and older is treatment with R-MP, comprising rituximab, high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and procarbazine followed by maintenance therapy with procarbazine. An alternative approach comprised of a shorter induction treatment with rituximab, HD-MTX and cytarabine (MARTA) followed by age-adjusted high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT) was recently shown to be feasible and effective in elderly PCNSL patients considered eligible for high-dose chemotherapy requiring autologous stem cell transplantation. Nevertheless, data evaluating this short duration treatment approach remains scarce, and randomized trials have not yet been published. The objective of the PRIMA-CNS trial is to demonstrate that intensified chemotherapy followed by consolidating HCT-ASCT is superior to conventional chemotherapy with R-MP followed by maintenance with procarbazine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL; not only regarding survival and remission after treatment but also regarding standards like quality of life (QOL) and treatment related morbidities. Results of this randomized trial will either change the standard of care to an intense and shorter treatment approach or re-define R-MP as a proven treatment standard. In addition, a geriatric assessement is implemented in this trial with the goal to better define transplant eligibility. If this trial shows the superiority of HCT-ASCT, the investigators will establish an improved treatment standard with increased chances for long-term remission and cure and reduced frequency and length of chemotherapy treatment. Considering the poor prognosis of this patient population, this randomized phase III trial is of great clinical importance to provide patients, the patients' families and care takers with optimal treatment.

Interventions

DRUGR-MP and Procarbazine maintenance

Firstline systemic treatment with conventinal immunochemotherapy (3 cycles of Rituximab-MTX-Procarbazine) followed by Procarbazine maintenance

DRUGR-MTX/AraC (MARTA) induction followed by consolidating HCT-ASCT

Firstline systemic treatment with age-adjusted MTX based induction (2 cycles of Rituximab-Methotrexate-Cytarabin) followed by consolidating aged-adapted high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation

Sponsors

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University Hospital Tuebingen
CollaboratorOTHER
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
CollaboratorOTHER
Klinikum Stuttgart
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Kaiserslautern
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Munich
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Regensburg
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Freiburg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter phase III trial with 2 parallel arms investigating a more intensive, shorter treatment with 2 cycles of MARTA (rituximab, HD-MTX, AraC) followed by HCT with rituximab, busulfan and thiotepa followed by ASCT compared to standard therapy comprising 3 cycles of R-MP followed by procarbazine maintenance for 6 months.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Immunocompetent patients with newly-diagnosed primary DLBCL of the central nervous system. 2. Age \> 70 years or age 65-70 years if not eligible for more intensive treatment (e.g. OptiMATe trial). 3. Histologically or cytologically assessed diagnosis of B-cell lymphoma by local pathologist. 4. Diagnostic sample obtained by stereotactic or surgical biopsy, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology examination or vitrectomy. 5. Disease exclusively located in the CNS. 6. At least 1 measurable lesion. 7. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)-Performance Status (PS) ≤ 2. ECOG PS \> 2 accepted if due to PCNSL symptoms. 8. Patients possibly eligible for HCT-ASCT as judged by the treating physician. 9. Written informed consent obtained according to international guidelines and local laws by patient or authorized legal representative in case patient is temporarily legally not competent due to his or her disease. Additional randomization criteria: 1. Patients eligible for HCT-ASCT defined by the EBL score (at most one of the 3 following conditions may apply: ECOG PS \> 1, Barthel Index of activities of daily living (ADL) \< 20 and Lachs geriatric screening \> 3), improvement of PS after pre-phase treatment or clinical judgement by the treating physician after discussion with the study expert team. 2. No evidence of disease progression after pre-phase treatment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Congenital or acquired immunodeficiency including HIV infection and previous organ transplantation. 2. Systemic lymphoma manifestation (outside the CNS). 3. Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma or primary leptomeningeal lymphoma without manifestation in the brain parenchyma or spinal cord. 4. Previous or concurrent malignancies with the exception of surgically cured carcinoma in situ or other kinds of cancer without evidence of disease for at least 5 years. 5. Previous systemic Non-Hodgkin lymphoma at any time. 6. Inadequate renal function (creatinine clearance \<60 ml/min). 7. Inadequate bone marrow, cardiac, pulmonary or hepatic function according to investigator´s decision. 8. Active hepatitis B or C disease. 9. Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs or participation in an interventional clinical trial with administration of study medication within the last thirty days before the start of this study. 10. Third space fluid accumulation \>500 ml. 11. Hypersensitivity to study treatment or any component of the formulation. 12. Taking any medications likely to cause interactions with the study medication. 13. Known or persistent abuse of medication, drugs or alcohol. 14. Active COVID-19-infection or non-compliance with the prevailing hygiene measures regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. 15. Patients without legal capacity and who are unable to understand the nature, significance and consequences of the study and without designated legal representative. 16. Previous participation in this trial. 17. Persons who are in a relationship of dependency/employment to the sponsor and/ or investigator. 18. Any familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule. 19. Fertile patients refusing to use safe contraceptive methods during the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression free survival (PFS) between the 2 armsup to 6 yearsPFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death of any cause, with censoring at the last date the patient was seen alive and free of disease progression

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Remission status after 2 cycles of rituximab-methotrexate-procarbazine (R-MP) (arm A)/2 cycles of R-MTX/cytarabine (AraC)at RA I: after 8 weeks (Arm A), after 6 weeks (Arm B)Remission status after 2 cycles of RMP (arm A) / 2 cycles of R-MTX/AraC will be determined at response assessment (RA) I in both arms and will be divided in complete remission (CR), unconfirmed complete remission (CRu), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease(PD) according to international PCNSL collaborative group (IPCG) criteria
Remission status after 3 cycles of R-MP (arm A)/consolidating HCT-ASCT (arm B)at RA II: after 12 weeksdetermined at response assessment (RA) II and will be divided in CR, CRu, PR, SD, PD according to IPCG criteria
Remission status after completion of maintenance treatment (arm A)/6 months follow-up (arm B)6 months after RA IIwill be determined 6 months after RA II and will be divided in CR, CRu, PR, SD, PD according to IPCG criteria
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30)from date of informed consent form (ICF) signature up to 6 yearsEORTC quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 performed at screening, at RA II /premature EOT and thereafter every 12 months during follow-up
Quality of Life (EORTC-QLQ BN 20)from date of informed consent form (ICF) signature up to 6 yearsEORTC-QLQ brain neoplasm (BN) 20, performed at screening, at RA II /premature EOT and thereafter every 12 months during follow-up
Overall survival (OS) between the 2 armsup to 6 yearsOS is defined as time from randomization until death from any cause, with censoring at the last date the patient was seen alive
Event free survival (EFS) between the 2 armsup to 6 yearsEFS, defined as time from randomization to premature end of treatment (EOT) due to any reason, lymphoma progression or death, whichever occurs first, with censoring at the last date the patient was seen event-free

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Unplanned hospital admissionsfrom date of informed consent form (ICF) signature until 30 days after ASCT or 30 days after last administration of investigational medicinal products (IMP)Defined as in-patient hospitalization due to SAE from date of informed consent form (ICF) signature until 30 days after ASCT or day 30 after last administration of IMP, whatever occurs first. Each hospitalization will be counted as a single event.
Length of hospital staysfrom date of informed consent form (ICF) signature until 30 days after ASCT or day 30 after last administration of IMPMeasured as number of nights in hospital due to SAE as defined above, i.e. hospital stays from date of ICF signature until 30 days after ASCT or day 30 after last administration of IMP, whatever occurs first.
Safety: Toxicityfrom date of informed consent form (ICF) signature until 30 days after end of treatmentIncidence of (Serious) adverse events ((S)AE) as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Safety: Neurotoxicityfrom date of informed consent form (ICF) signature up to 6 yearsResults in the following neuropsychological tests: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Trail Making Test A and B, the Rey-Osterrieth-Complex-Figure-Test and a verbal fluency test, performed at screening, RA II / premature EOT and every 12 months during follow-up.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactElisabeth Schorb, MD
elisabeth.schorb@uniklinik-freiburg.de+49 761 270-35360
Backup ContactGerald Illerhaus, MD
g.illerhaus@klinikum-stuttgart.de+49 711 278-30400

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026