Skip to content

Comparing Standard of Care Biopsy System to a Novel Biopsy Needle System by Computational Pathologic Analysis

Comparing a Standard of Care Prostate Biopsy System With a Novel System Using Standard as Well as Computational Pathology Analyses to Measure Clinical and Morphometric Parameters.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06830265
Enrollment
200
Registered
2025-02-17
Start date
2025-07-07
Completion date
2026-12-10
Last updated
2026-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer Screening

Keywords

Randomized Two-arm

Brief summary

Prostate biopsy is the definitive examination to establish the diagnosis of prostate cancer, but up to 40% of these biopsies overestimate or underestimate the severity of the disease. A novel biopsy needle system captures substantially more tissue than standard of care needles, but it is important to assess the retrieval of tissue for pathologic analyses. This study will compare quality and quantity of tissue retrieved by both systems. Further, tissue will be analyzed using computational pathology algorithms for atypical small acinar proliferation and Gleason scores in terms of tissue area, tissue length, and tissue tortuosity.

Detailed description

Prostate tissue captured in needle biopsy procedures are used to diagnose prostate cancer, but current biopsy systems (standard of care control device) have been shown to underperform when compared to a new novel needle biopsy system (test device). The objectives of the study are to (1) compare tissue quality between test and control devices; (2) compare diagnostic ambiguity between the two devices; and (3) compare tissue area, length, and tortuosity from the samples with a computational pathology algorithm. Tissue analyses will be completed by pathologists blinded to the biopsy system used.

Interventions

DEVICENovel needle biopsy catheter (test)

Tissue is collected from the prostate by introducing a needle into the prostate and cutting out a sample

Sponsors

Uro-1 Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
NYU Langone Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Novant Health, Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Each patient enrolled will have prostate biopsy completed with a standard of care needle biopsy system (control) and a novel needle biopsy system (test), each targeting separate regions of the prostate.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult males with PSA density greater than or equal to 0.15 * Lesions are visible under MRI * PIRADS score is greater than or equal to 3 * Able to and willing to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has had previous local prostate therapy, focal therapy, brachytherapy, ADT, surgery, or chemotherapy for prostate cancer * History of dementia, cognitive impairment, or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) * Is a prisoner currently or has a history of incarceration * Unable to understand English * Has metastatic prostate cancer or a tumor stage of T2c, T3, or T4 * Has concurrent malignancies * Is positive for HIV, HBV, and/or HCV infection * Has low-performance status

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Atypical Small Acinar ProliferationFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 1 dayPresence of suspicious prostate gland cells that appear cancerous but are not definitive enough to diagnose cancer
Gleason ScoreFrom enrollment to end of treatment at 1 dayPathologist scores the biopsy sample for the percentage of samples with a Gleason score of 7, 8, 9 or 10.
Tissue area and lengthFrom treatment to end of pathology review at 2 daysThe amount of tissue retrieved by either biopsy systems-- area and length-- will be measured using computational pathology and compared
Tissue toruosityFrom treatment to end of pathology review at 2 daysTortuosity will be ranked from Tier 1 (high quality) to Tier 4 (low quality) using the computational pathology algorithm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Standard Pathology versus Computational Pathology ResultsFrom treatment to end of pathology review at 2 daysTissue samples will be analyzed by standard pathology techniques and computational pathology and differences in values of diagnosis, Gleason score, percent tumor volume, presence of cribiform glands, and perineural invasion compared

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTThomas Lawson, PhD
tlawson@uro1medical.com510-206-1794
CONTACTTed Belleza, BA
tbelleza@uro1medical.com831-295-7133
STUDY_DIRECTORThomas Lawson

Uro-1 Medical

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 5, 2026