Skip to content

Calf Circumference Adjusted for Body Composition to Assess Muscle Mass

Calf Circumference Adjusted for Body Composition to Assess Muscle Mass

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06829004
Enrollment
150
Registered
2025-02-17
Start date
2025-02-15
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscle Mass, Obesity and Overweight

Brief summary

Muscle mass is a critical indicator for malnutrition and sarcopenia assessment. Anthropometric measurements like calf circumference (CC) could be a simple and cost-effective alternative when gold standard methods are not available. However, CC is probably less accurate for estimating muscle mass in female patients and patients with obesity. This study investigates whether adjusting CC using mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) improves muscle mass estimation in patients with obesity. If validated, this correction method would serve as a simple clinical tool for muscle mass assessment.

Detailed description

The patient's demographic data including age, sex, primary diagnosis, and diagnoses of co-morbidities are found by the investigator in the medical history (eHL). The researcher codes the current main diagnosis and its severity: we use the World Health Organization's ICD-11 classification (icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en) and a three-point scale where 1 is mild and 3 is severe. The patient will be interviewed for changes in body weight and food intake. Anthropometric measurements will be recorded, including height, weight, body mass index (BMI), mid upper arm circumference, calf circumference, and waist circumference. The accurate muscle mass measurement will be done using total body densitometry (DEXA) scan, that was already ordered for other purposes. Bone mineral density (BMD) from DEXA scan will be recorded. This allows us to see if calf circumference can be used for estimating bone mineral density. Patients will be followed up one year after data collection. Follow up will involve calling the patients and asking them questions from the SarQoL (sarcopenia quality of life questionnaire) Calf circumference will be measured using non-elastic tape at the widest part of the dominant calf in the seated position with the weight evenly distributed on both feet (1). Mid upper arm circumference will be measured at the midpoint between the acromial surface of the scapula and the olecranon process of the elbow over the dominant arm when bent at 90 degrees. Waist circumference will be measured using measuring tape 2.5 cm above the umbilicus in a standing position. Waist circumference is used to define obesity as it is a marker of abdominal obesity (2). We aim to keep the interview no longer than 10 minutes. Demographic and anthropometric data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. The sensitivity, specificity of muscle mass measurements will be calculated. Corrected calf circumference will be compared to DEXA (gold standard diagnostic tool) and new cutoffs will be defined by using Receiver Operating Characteristic curves. Statistical analyses will be performed using R.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Tartu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Booked to undergo bone density scanning (DEXA) at Tartu University Hospital

Exclusion criteria

Isolation for infectious disease Pregnancy and lactation Unable to understand or follow study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of corrected calf circumference in estimating muscle mass15 monthsAccuracy of corrected calf circumference in estimating muscle mass in comparison to densitometry (DEXA) used as a gold standard

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of accuracy of corrected calf measurement results in female patients15 monthsComparison of accuracy of results in female patients thought to be in greater need of correction
Comparison of accuracy of corrected calf measurement results in obese patients15 monthsCalf measurement results thought to be less reliable in obese patients
Quality of life with and without corrected results of anthropometry15 monthsLow muscle mass is associated with poor quality of life and may be estimated better with anthropometric corrections. Quality of life will be measured using the SarQoL tool designed to examine quality of life in sarcopenia (0-100 scale high being good)
Bone density estimated from corrected calf circumference15 monthsBone density may be possible to estimate from corrected calf circumference

Contacts

Primary ContactGrete Kurik, MSc
grete.kurik@ut.ee+37253436535
Backup ContactAlastair Forbes, MD
alastair.forbes@ut.ee+37258830422

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026