Skip to content

Does Increasing the Compression Pause From 3 to 5 Seconds in Mechanical Compression Devices Increase Ventilation Success Rate and Return of Spontaneous Circulation?

Does Increasing the Compression Pause From 3 to 5 Seconds in Mechanical Compression Devices Increase Ventilation Success Rate and Return of Spontaneous Circulation?

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06824961
Acronym
LUCASVP
Enrollment
692
Registered
2025-02-13
Start date
2026-01-15
Completion date
2027-07-01
Last updated
2026-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest (CA)

Keywords

Advanced life support, Basic life support, Cardiac arrest, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR, ALS, BLS, Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, OHCA, Mechanical chest compression devices, Mechanical CPR, Ventilation

Brief summary

To give chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), mechanical chest compression devices can be used. During synchronous 30:2 CPR, the standard setting on these devices leave an automated 3-second chest compression pause after 30 compressions to facilitate caregivers in providing two ventilations. With this standard setting, research has shown that in less than half of ventilation pauses during CPR, those two ventilations are given. Increasing the ventilation pause duration to 5 seconds instead of 3 seconds is also an option following current guideline recommendations, and aligns with measured ventilation pause duration in manual CPR. Increasing pause duration to 5 seconds could result in an increased ventilation success rate. This multicenter randomized controlled trial will randomize LUCAS® mechanical compression devices to a standard setting of 3- or 5-second compression pauses. The main outcome will be the percentage of ventilation pauses in which two ventilations are successfully given. Secondary outcomes include the restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and the difference in (neurologically intact) survival. No study has been performed to evaluate this effect yet.

Interventions

OTHER5-second ventilation pause duration during mechanical CPR

The intervention is a 5-second lasting ventilation pause during mechanical CPR

OTHER3-second ventilation pause duration during mechanical CPR

The intervention is a 3-second lasting ventilation pause during mechanical CPR

Sponsors

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Multicenter, single blinded (patients), randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults (≥16 years of age) * OHCA patients with an attempt at cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by ambulance personnel * LUCAS® 3.1 has been used during the resuscitation attempt

Exclusion criteria

* Missing ambulance run report, missing or unclear impedance signal (measurement of resistance across the thorax), making it impossible to assess the number of ventilation pauses * Absence of a minimum of 3 assessable pauses intended for ventilation after connecting the LUCAS®

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of ventilation pauses in which two ventilations are givenFrom enrollment to end of mechanically assisted CPR by ambulance nurses (approximate maximum timeframe of 3 hours)The difference in percentage of ventilation pauses in which two ventilations are given between the intervention and control group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival to hospital dischargeFrom enrollment to hospital discharge (approximate maximum timeframe of 3 months)The difference in percentage of participants with and without survival to hospital discharge
30-day survivalFrom enrollment to 30 days after cardiac arrestThe difference in percentage of participants with and without survival at 30 days after the cardiac arrest
Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)From enrollment to end of cardiac arrest treatment (approximate maximum timeframe of 5 hours)The difference in percentage of participants with and without ROSC
Number of rhythm checks per five minutes, expectedFrom enrollment to prehospital termination of CPR or handover at hospital by ambulance nurses (approximate maximum timeframe of 3 hours)The difference in the number of rhythm checks per five minutes performed with and without pausing the mechanical compression device, compared to the expected number of rhythm checks in that time frame (once every two minutes) between groups
Number of rhythm checks per five minutes, observedFrom enrollment to prehospital termination of CPR or handover at hospital by ambulance nurses (approximate maximum of 3 hours)The difference in the number of rhythm checks per five minutes performed with and without pausing the mechanical compression device, compared to the observed number of rhythm checks in that time frame (once every two minutes) between groups
Average tidal volume (ml)From enrollment to end of intra-arrest ambulance monitor registration or flow/pressure measurements (approximate maximum timeframe of 3 hours)Difference in average tidal volumes (ml) between groups
Average minute volume (ml/min)From enrollment to end of intra-arrest ambulance monitor registration or flow/pressure measurements (approximate maximum timeframe of 3 hours)Difference in average minute volumes (ml/min) between groups
Average respiratory rate (rate per minute)From enrollment to end of intra-arrest ambulance monitor registration or flow/pressure measurements (approximate maximum timeframe of 3 hours)Difference in average respiratory rate (rate per minute) between groups
Average airway pressure (cmH2O)From enrollment to end of intra-arrest ambulance monitor registration or flow/pressure measurements (approximate maximum timeframe of 3 hours)Difference average airway pressures (cmH2O) between groups
Chest compression fraction (CCF)From enrollment to end of intra-arrest registration of ambulance monitor (approximate maximum timeframe of 3 hours)Difference in chest compression fraction (CCF) between groups
Cerebral performance score (CPC score) at hospital discharge (CPC 1-2 vs. 3-4)From enrollment to hospital discharge (approximate maximum timeframe of 3 months)The difference in percentage of participants with a CPC of 1-2 (good neurological recovery) vs. 3-4 (poor neurological recovery) at hospital discharge CPC score system: 1. Normal (good cerebral performance) 2. Moderate disability (disabled but independent) 3. Severe disability (conscious but disabled and dependent) 4. Unconscious (coma or vegetative state)
Subjective experience of ambulance nurses with the mechanical CPR device and it's ventilation pause settingsAfter the last inclusion of the study, with an approximate time frame of 1-2 months to respond to the anonymous surveyExploratory anonymous questionnaire of subjective experience of ambulance nurses with the mechanical CPR device (the LUCAS) and it's ventilation pause settings during the resuscitation.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

CONTACTLotte C Doeleman, MD
l.c.doeleman@amsterdamumc.nl+31205665969
CONTACTHans L van Schuppen, PhD
j.l.vanschuppen@amsterdamumc.nl+31205665969
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPatrick Schober, MD, PhD

Amsterdam UMC

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 22, 2026