Mid-Rectal Cancer, Rectal Cancer Stage II, Rectal Cancer Stage III
Conditions
Keywords
Mid-Rectal Cancer, Radiotherapy, Mesorectal fascia
Brief summary
This project aims to compare the oncological and functional outcomes of patients with mid-rectal cancer who have a low risk of local recurrence (without MRF involvement) and who either receive or do not receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Main Question: H0: In mid-rectal cancer patients without MRF involvement (cT2N+ and cT3Nx), there is no difference in 3-year disease-free survival between direct TME and TME after nCRT. H1: In mid-rectal cancer patients without MRF involvement (cT2N+ and cT3Nx), direct TME is associated with worse 3-year disease-free survival compared to TME after nCRT. Participants already taking both interventions as part of their regular medical care for rectal cancer will be recruited in a prospective database for 5 years.
Detailed description
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. This approach has been shown to improve local control and reduce recurrence rates. However, there is no clear evidence showing the advantage of neoadjuvant CRT in high and middle rectal tumors without involvement of mesorectal fascia (MRF). The MERCURY study demonstrated that preoperative MRI-predicted positive CRM is an independent factor for local recurrence. Following this study, the selective use of nCRT in patients at high risk of local recurrence has been proposed. The ESMO guidelines indicate that T3a/b rectal tumors located above the levator muscles, without involvement of the circumferential resection margin (CRM) or extramural venous invasion (EMVI), are associated with a very low risk of local recurrence. Consequently, they suggest that upfront TME may be an appropriate treatment option for this subgroup of patients. This recommendation remains unchanged in the presence of lymph node involvement within the same group. For clinically staged cT3a/b mid- or high-rectal tumors with clear CRM and no evidence of EMVI, the routine use of nCRT remains a subject of debate. If the surgeon consistently performs high-quality total mesorectal excision (TME), upfront surgery may be a suitable treatment option for this subgroup of patients. In line with these recommendations, some surgeons perform upfront TME for patients with T2-3 node-positive mid-rectal cancer in the absence of MRF involvement. However, in these cases, the common approach is to administer neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This study seeks to observe whether upfront TME achieves similar 3-year disease-free survival compared to the standard approach of nCRT followed by TME in patients with cT2N+ and cT3Nx mid-rectal cancer without mesorectal fascia involvement.
Interventions
OTHERTotal mesorectal excision
Direct surgery without receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
OTHERNeoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment regimens (including conventional chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy/chemotherapy regimens or total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens) before surgery
Sponsors
Baskent University
Dokuz Eylul University
Halic University
Acibadem Kent Hospital
Istanbul Health and Technology University
Turkish Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Pathologically confirmed rectal cancer * Rectal cancer within 6-12 cm from anal verge confirmed by sigmoidoscopy or located between the anorectal junction and peritoneal reflection identified by MRI * Clinical local staging performed by MRI * cT2N+, cT3N0 and cT3N+ tumors * Patients without mesorectal fascia involvement assessed by MRI (≤1 mm) * Patients without pathological (short axis ≥7 mm) lateral (extramesorectal) lymph nodes on MRI * Patients without EMVI on MRI
Exclusion criteria
* cT4 tumors * Stage IV disease * Patients with MSI (+) in TME pathology * PAtients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy * Emergency surgery * Clinical obstruction * Previous pelvic radiotherapy * Patients treated without a multidisciplinary council decision * Inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease, Ulcerative colitis) * Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), attenuated FAP, and other polyposis syndromes * Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) * Synchronous colon tumors
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Disease-free survival (DFS) | 3 years | The proportion of patients who remain free of disease recurrence (local or distant) three years after surgical intervention. DFS will be assessed through clinical evaluations, imaging studies, and pathology reports at regular follow-up intervals. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival | 3 and 5 years | The proportion of patients alive at 3 and 5 years post-treatment, regardless of disease status. |
| Local Recurrence Rate | 3 years and 5 years | The percentage of patients experiencing tumor recurrence at the primary site (anastomosis or pelvis) within 3 and 5 years. |
| Colorectal Cancer Specific Quality of Life | Baseline, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years | Patient-reported outcomes assessed using the New Cleveland Clinic Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire |
| Bowel Dysfunction Related Quality of Life | Baseline, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years | Patient-reported outcomes assessed using the low-anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Contacts
Primary ContactCigdem N Arslan, Prof.
Backup ContactFeza Karakayali, Prof.
Outcome results
None listed