Skip to content

Effects of Movement Representation Techniques With Sensorimotor Training for Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain

Effects of Movement Representation Techniques With Sensorimotor Training for Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06823206
Enrollment
122
Registered
2025-02-12
Start date
2025-03-01
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of 12 weeks of sensorimotor training with movement representation techniques for reducing pain intensity in people with rotator cuff related shoulder pain, relative to standard care. Besides, the secondary aim of this study is to explore the mechanisms underlying the effects of central mechanism treatment in people with rotator cuff related shoulder pain. A total of 122 older adults aged 50 or above with the presence of shoulder pain for more than three months will be recruited and randomized into 12-weeks of movement representation techniques with sensorimotor training vs. standard care. Shoulder pain and disability Index (SPADI), changes in primary motor cortex (M1) using brain MRI, changes in subacromial space using ultrasound imaging, Widespread Pain Index (WPI), Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), and Fear-avoidance Beliefs questionnaires (FABQ) will be assessed at baseline and 12-week post intervention.

Interventions

OTHERSensorimotor training with movement representation techniques

Sensorimotor training will be implemented with movement representation techniques using a standardized retraining sequence of a shoulder control exercise during arm elevation with 3 phases: Phase 1: Action Observation Training; Phase 2: Mirror therapy; and Phase 3: Sensorimotor training of the involved arm. Each session will last 60 minutes, with one supervised intervention session over the 12 weeks.

Sponsors

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 50 or above * Presence of shoulder pain for more than three months * Clinical test showed 3/5 positive tests (painful arc, resisted external rotation, Neer test, Kennedy-Hawkins test, and Jobe test), and the intensity of pain being provoked should be ≥ 3/10 on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) * Structural changes of rotator cuff tendons using MRI or ultrasound imaging

Exclusion criteria

* History of trauma * Shoulder fracture, glenohumeral osteoarthritis, or arthritis in the acromioclavicular joint * Clinically suspected labrum lesion * Previous shoulder surgery or dislocation * Clinical signs of anterior shoulder instability * Clinical signs of frozen shoulders * Previous clinical treatment or corticosteroid injection for a shoulder injury within the last 12 months * Symptoms referred from or related to the spine; and (9) other competing diagnoses (i.e., rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, neurological disorders, fibromyalgia, or psychiatric illness).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensityBaseline and 12-weeks post-interventionPain will be assessed using the pain sub-score of the Chinese Version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. It is a validated self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate upper limb symptoms and functional limitations during daily activities. The questionnaire consists of 13 items with two subscales, i.e., pain intensity (five items) and disability (eight items), and each subscale-item will be summed to obtain a pain-score and a disability-score. The total of all items will be summed to obtain the final scores for each domain ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more pain and disability. In the present study, the pain sub-score will be used as the measure of average pain intensity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cortical thickness in the primary motor cortex (M1) using brain MRIBaseline and 12 weeks post-interventionThe brain structure will be measured using structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on a 3.0 T Siemens Prisma scanner. During the resting-state scan, the participants will be instructed to rest with their eyes closed while remaining stationary for 30 minutes. The regional cortical thickness of the brain region, the primary motor cortex (M1), will be extracted from T1-weighted MRI images.

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

CONTACTAnnie LEONG
annie-ht.leong@polyu.edu.hk85227666707

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 18, 2026