Bipolar Disorders, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Major Depressive Disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, PTSD
Conditions
Keywords
TMS, Spravato, Esketamine, Treatment response, Speech, Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Acoustic Analysis, Acoustic Biomarkers, Vocal Biomarkers, Machine Learning, Mental Health, Speech Analysis
Brief summary
This is a research study looking at whether the way people speak can help predict how well they'll respond to certain mental health treatments. The Main Goal: The researchers want to see if computer analysis of a person's speech patterns can predict whether they'll respond well to two specific treatments: TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) and Spravato (a nasal spray medication). They're focusing on people with depression, bipolar disorder, OCD, anxiety, and PTSD. How It Works: 200 people with these conditions will participate in the study.Participants will record themselves speaking for about 12 minutes, responding to six different prompts.They'll do these recordings before treatment starts, daily during treatment, right after treatment ends, and again four weeks later. Doctors will track how well people are doing using various questionnaires and rating scales The researchers will look for connections between speech patterns and treatment success. The study will last 12 months. What Makes Someone a Treatment Success: The study considers treatment successful if a person's symptoms improve significantly (specifically, a 2-point or greater reduction on a clinical rating scale (called Clinical Global Impression) and stays improved during the follow-up period (4-weeks). Why This Matters: If successful, this research could lead to a simple, non-invasive way to help doctors predict which treatments might work best for different patients. This could help people get the most effective treatment more quickly and help healthcare providers use their resources more efficiently. Safety Consideration The researchers will also check whether doing the speech assessments causes any distress to participants, making sure the evaluation process itself is safe and comfortable.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Psyrin Inc.
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 68 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Outpatient status 2. Men and women aged 18-68 years 3. Capable and willing to provide informed consent 4. Able to adhere to the treatment schedule 5. Stable on medication for at least 2 months with no anticipated changes during the study period 6. Diagnosis of MDD, PTSD, or BD 7. Eligible for and scheduled to receive TMS or Spravato (esketamine) treatment to alleviate symptoms of MDD, PTSD, GAD, OCD or BD 8. Fluent in English 9. Access to a stable internet connection and an electronic device with a microphone for voice recording
Exclusion criteria
1. Use of any investigational drug within four weeks of the baseline visit 2. If participating in psychotherapy, the patient must have been in stable treatment for at least three months before study entry, with no anticipated changes in the frequency of therapeutic sessions or therapeutic focus during the TMS or Spravato treatment. 3. Intoxication during speech assessments 4. Cognitive impairment that would interfere with study participation or data quality 5. Lack of fluency in English
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment response | Change between Baseline and Week 0 (post-intervention) | ≥ 2 points symptom severity reduction between baseline and after-treatment evaluation on the clinical global impression severity scale (CGI-S) (between 1, normal, not at all ill, and 7, among the most extremely ill patients). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Remission | Change between Baseline and Week 0 (post-intervention), Week 4 (post-intervention) | Symptoms below the threshold for having the disorder according to CGI-S and clinical judgement. |
| Stability of treatment response | Change between Baseline and Week 4 (post-intervention) | ≥ 2 points symptom severity reduction between baseline and follow-up evaluation after-treatment on the clinical global impression severity scale (CGI-S) (between 1, normal, not at all ill, and 7, among the most extremely ill patients). |
| Distress caused by the online speech assessment | Week 4 | Self-reported distress caused by the online speech assessment. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed