Skip to content

Protein Supplementation in Hyponatremia Due to the Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuresis

Effect of Protein Supplementation in Hospitalized Patients With Hyponatremia Due to the Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuresis - a Monocentric Randomized Open-label Pragmatic Active-controlled Trial - the TREASUREx Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06821802
Acronym
TREASUREx
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-02-12
Start date
2025-04-14
Completion date
2027-04-30
Last updated
2025-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyponatremia, Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuresis

Keywords

dysregulated arginine vasopressin (AVP) secretion, increased renal AVP sensitivity, protein supplementation, fluid restriction

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to assess the impact of protein supplementation on hyponatremia caused by the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis during hospitalization.

Detailed description

Hyponatremia (plasma sodium \<135 mmol/L) is the most common electrolyte disorder, affecting up to 30% of hospitalized patients. Chronic hyponatremia (\>48 hours) is linked to longer hospital stays, higher costs, increased mortality, and morbidity (e.g., falls, fractures, cognitive deficits). The most common cause of euvolemic hyponatremia is syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD), characterized by excessive water retention due to dysregulated vasopressin activity. Treatment options include fluid restriction or increasing water excretion with AVP antagonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, or oral urea. A recent trial showed that protein supplementation can induce osmotic diuresis and raise sodium levels similarly to oral urea, with better tolerability. Since protein supplementation is often used in hospitalized patients with malnutrition, this study aims to compare its acceptability to fluid restriction in hospitalized SIAD patients. This head-to-head superiority trial will randomize patients to receive either 80 g of dietary protein daily or fluid restriction (1000 mL/day) for up to 5 days. The hypothesis is that protein supplementation is significantly more acceptable to patients than fluid restriction, ultimately improving treatment outcomes.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTMoltein PURE Protein Powder

80 g protein supplementation per day (two bottles, each containing 40 g protein)

total daily fluid intake to a maximum of 1000 ml

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients with confirmed SIAD during the hospital stay or at screening, defined by: * Plasma sodium concentration \<135 mmol/L * Plasma osmolality \<300 mOsm/kg * Urine osmolality \>100 mOsm/kg * Urine sodium concentration \>30 mmol/L * Clinical euvolemia (no signs of hypovolemia or hypervolemia)

Exclusion criteria

* Lactose intolerance, milk protein allergy, soy allergy, nuts allergy, or hypersensitivity to components of the protein supplement. * Inborn metabolic disorders affecting carbohydrate, lipid, or protein metabolism. * Severe symptomatic hyponatremia requiring 3% NaCl or intensive care. * New (within the last five days) treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors, vaptans or oral urea * Uncontrolled severe hypothyroidism (untreated) * Uncontrolled adrenal insufficiency (morning cortisol \<150nmol/l) * eGFR \<45 mL/min/1.73 m² (KDIGO G3b-5) or end-stage renal disease (dialysis) * Severe hepatic impairment or advanced symptomatic liver disease defined as past or current hepatic encephalopathy, liver cirrhosis Child C, or decompensated (bleeding, jaundice, hepatorenal syndrome) * Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or plans to become pregnant during the study. * End-of-life care * Lack of capacity or other reasons preventing from giving informed consent or following study procedures (e.g., due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc.) * Treatment with thiazid diuretic (must be stopped at least 48 hours before inclusion) Post-randomization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) questionnaireOn day 5 (or discharge)Treatment acceptability is assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) questionnaire, a validated patient-reported outcome measure scored on a 1 to 5 Likert scale. The total AIM score ranges from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability. The primary analysis will compare AIM scores between the two treatment groups at the end of the intervention (day 5 or discharge).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fluid intakeDaily measurements from the day of inclusion to day 5Oral daily fluid intake assessed using a self-completed drinking protocol.
Plasma sodium levelsDaily measurements from the day of inclusion to day 5Change in change in plasma sodium levels in mmol/l will be assessed at study inclusion to day 5 of treatment or until discharge
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)On the day of inclusion and on day 5Assessement of creatinine levels
Changes in blood electrolytesOn the day of inclusion and on day 5Assessement of sodium levels
Changes in urine electrolytesOn the day of inclusion and on day 5Assessement of sodium levels
Changes in glucose levelsOn the day of inclusion and on day 5Assessement of glucose levels
Changes kidney parametersOn the day of inclusion and on day 5Assessement of urea and uric acid levels
Plasma sodium levels one day after treatment startOn the day of inclusion and 12-36 hours after treatment initiationPlasma sodium levels 12-36 hours after treatment start in patients with a plasma sodium concentration \<125 mmol/L at baseline.
Changes in body weightOn the day of inclusion and on day 5Body weight is assessed
General well-beingOn the day of inclusion and on day 5General well-being measured by numerical rating scale (NRS). Score from 0-10 while 10 indicates improved well-being
Symptoms of hyponatremiaOn the day of inclusion and on day 5Symptoms of hyponatremia (e.g. vertigo, headache, nausea, attention deficit, mental slowness, forgetfulness, gait instability) assessed by a questionnaire (yes/no; if yes: VAS, 0-10).
Changes in blood pressureOn the day of inclusion and on day 5Systolic and diastolic blood pressure will be measured
Changes in heart rateOn the day of inclusion and on day 5Heart rate will be assessed
Differences in clinical outcomes - length of hospital staysDaily from the day of inclusion to day 5Length of hospital stays will be assessed
Need for additional hyponatremia treatment and treatment escalationDaily from the day of inclusion to day 5Assessment of treatment escalation (YES/NO) including: A: administration of 3% NaCl infusion; B: administration of oral urea; C administration of SGLT2 inhibitors; D: administration of vaptans; E: administration of diuretics; F: other during the treatment period.
Treatment complianceDaily from the day of inclusion to day 5The participant's daily consumption of protein drinks and/or their adherence to a fluid restriction regimen is recorded.
Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaireOn the day of inclusion and on day 5Participants' health-related quality of life is assessed using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. , which includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated on five levels, ranging from no problems to extreme problems.
Endocrine parametersOn the day of inclusion and on day 5Blood levels of copeptin, aldosterone, renin, MR-proANP and NT-proBNP, apelin, etc. are assessed

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactMirjam Christ-Crain, Prof. MD
mirjam.christ-crain@usb.ch+41 61 328 70 80
Backup ContactCemile Bathelt
cemile.bathelt@usb.ch+41 61 556 54 07

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026