Skip to content

Effects of Movement Pattern Training Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Training in Footballers With Groin Pain

Effects of Movement Pattern Training Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Training on Pain Range of Motion Flexibility and Kick Distance in Footballers With Groin Pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06819384
Enrollment
36
Registered
2025-02-11
Start date
2024-04-24
Completion date
2025-02-15
Last updated
2025-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sports Physical Therapy

Keywords

Groin, Hip, Movements, Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation

Brief summary

Effects Of Movement Pattern Training Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation On Pain Range Of Motion Flexibility and Kick Distance Among Footballers With Groin Pain.

Detailed description

According to the literature, due to the small number of PT studies on elite athletes (compared with the number of studies on general athletes), it is necessary to further understand whether PT can also benefit this group and accurately test the sports science equipment to facilitate the planning of accurate training courses.There is limited number of studies that have investigated comparative effects of pattern training and propiocetive neuro muscular facilitation..Also, there was no study found that Effects Of Movement Pattern Training Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation On Pain Range Of Motion Flexibility and Kick Distance Among Footballers With Groin Pain.

Interventions

The group A Movement Pattern Training 2set each set 20 repition lasting for eight weeks.

The group B propioceptive neuromuscular facilitation 2set each set 20 repition lasting for eight weeks.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Single (Participant) the participants are blind

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment randomized control design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
15 Years to 41 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* History of groin or adductor strain Patient Neurological involvement that influenced coordination or balance * Male players,groin pain during or after the game * groin pain \> 8 weeks. * Tenderness on palpation. * pain during hip adduction with resistance * Willingness to participate in the research

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with urinary tract infection * Lower limb fractures, * metastasis * Spinal pathology, * hip joint osteoarthritis * Inguinal pain(2).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Hip Outcome Tool8 weeksOverall iHOT-33 and iHOT-12 scores were calculated as the mean visual analog scale score for the individual items for each questionnaire for each patient)
Sit And Reach Flexibility Test.8 weeksThe sit and reach test is a common measure of flexibility, and specifically measures the flexibility of the lower back and hamstring muscles.sit and reach box (or alternatively a ruler can be used, and a step or box)
Hip Rotation (Goniometer)8 weeksHip Internal and External Rotation Range of motions will be measured
Kicking For Distance8 weeksMeasuring Tapes will be used to measure the kick distance

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026