Skip to content

Comparative Study Between Rezum Therapy in Small and Large Prostates

Four-year Follow-up in Rezum Therapy of Small Prostates in Comparison with Large Prostates. a Prospective Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06818383
Enrollment
178
Registered
2025-02-10
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2025-02-01
Last updated
2025-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Hyperplasia

Keywords

Rezum, LUTS

Brief summary

The investigators aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Rezūm therapy for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in small and large prostates.

Detailed description

For decades, Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was the gold standard surgical intervention for small and moderate prostates, however it has high morbidity and prolonged hospital stay Rezūm is a radiofrequency made water vapour thermal treatment. It has recently been added to the international guidelines as a choice for medical treatment resistant lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The AUA and Canadian Urological Association (CUA) guidelines now add water vapour therapy as a treatment option for BPH patients with small prostate size \<80 gm and for those wishing to maintain antegrade ejaculation. While investigators still offer no clear recommendation to Rezūm use for those with large prostates.

Interventions

DEVICERezum therapy

minimal invasive technique for treating BPH

Sponsors

khaled Abdelsattar Gad Ibrahim
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

two groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. prostate size 45-75 gm 2. sexually active 3. mod - sever LUTS 4. Q max \< 15 5. IPSS \> 15 6. failed medical treatment with alpha blockers

Exclusion criteria

1. neurogenic bladder 2. urethral stricture 3. UB stones 4. cancer prostate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post operative residual urine (PVR)for each case in both groups the investigator assess prostate size at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 yearsPVR was measured by ml by pelvi abdominal ultra sound in both groups. Normal ranges are below 150 ml of urine.
The Maximum Urinary flow rate (Qmax)for each case in both groups the investigator assess Qmax at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years]Measurement of The Maximum Urinary flow rate (Qmax) in both groups After 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the procedure is performed. Qmax is measured by (ml/sec) Normal values are described as a Qmax above 15 ml/sec and below 10 ml/sec is considered abnormal
The Quality of Life (QoL)for each case in both groups the investigator assess QoLat 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years]Measurement of The Quality of Life (QoL) in both groups After 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the questioner is performed. Minimum :0 means delighted / Maximum : 5 means unhappy
The Prostatic specific antigen (PSA)for each case in both groups the investigator measures PSA at 3, 12, and 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 yearsConcentration of The Prostatic specific antigen (PSA) in both groups after 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the procedure is performed. PSA is measured by ng/ml PSA levels of 4.0 ng/ mL and lower were considered
The International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS)for each case in both groups the investigator assess IPSS at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 yearsMeasurement of The International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS) in both groups After 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the questioner is performed. Minimum :0 / Maximum : 35 Total score: 0-7 Mildly symptomatic; 8-19 moderately symptomatic; 20-35 severely symptomatic
The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)for each case in both groups the investigator assess IIEF at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 yearsMeasurement of The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in both groups After 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the questioner is performed. The IIEF-5 score is the sum of the ordinal responses to the 5 items.
The Prostate sizefor each case in both groups the investigator assess prostate size at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 yearsthe prostate size was measured by grams by Trans-rectal ultra sound
The operative timefor each case in both groups the investigator assess the time of operation from induction of anaesthesia till the end of the operation through study completion, an average of 4 yearsthe operative time was measured by minutes in both groups.
Incidence of The catheter duration post operativefor each case in both groups the investigator assess the catheter duration from the end of the operation till removal through study completion, an average of 4 yearsThe catheter duration was measured by days in both groups
Post operative hospital stay timefor each case in both groups the investigator assess the hospital time from the day of admission of the patient in hospital to do intervention till discharge from hospital through study completion, an average of 4 yearsthe Post operative hospital stay time was measured by hours in both groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of complicationsthrough four yearsFor each case in both groups the investigator assess the safety using incidence of complications by The Clavien-Dindo system

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026