Skip to content

Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran and Enoxaparin in Patients With Portal Vein Thrombosis With Cirrhosis

Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran and Enoxaparin in Patients With Portal Vein Thrombosis With Cirrhosis: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06818279
Enrollment
120
Registered
2025-02-10
Start date
2025-01-31
Completion date
2026-01-31
Last updated
2025-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Cirrhosis, Portal Vein Thrombosis

Brief summary

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is prevalent among patients with cirrhosis, and its prevalence rises with the severity of liver disease. Numerous studies have indicated that patients developing PVT experience elevated portal pressure and associated complications, such as increased incidence of variceal bleeding, higher rates of failed variceal bleed control, rebleeding, and short-term mortality. Additionally, the development of PVT adversely affects post-transplant outcomes, correlating with increased 30-day mortality among transplant recipients with PVT. Current guidelines lack clarity regarding the optimal choice of anticoagulation therapy for patients with cirrhosis. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin and dabigatran in achieving complete recanalization of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients over a 6-month period.

Detailed description

Study population: Cirrhosis with portal vein thrombosis within 6 months of diagnosis of portal vein thrombus Study design - A prospective, randomized, single center open label study Block Randomization, block size - 10 Study site - Department of Hepatology, ILBS, New Delhi from The study will be conducted on the consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis with portal vein thrombosis. Study period -1 year Monitoring and assessment * At enrollment: 1. Complete history and physical examination 2. Etiology of cirrhosis 3. Presenting symptoms 4. Severity of ascites, Jaundice 5. Pattern and number of prior decompensation 6. UGIE and variceal status 7. Complete physical evaluation 8. Hemogram, Kidney function test, Liver function test, INR 9. Ultrasound abdomen with spleno-portal axis doppler / CECT upper abdomen 10. Fibroscan-liver and spleen 11. 2D-ECHO, ECG 12. AFP At follow-up (1month, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month 12month) <!-- --> 1. Complete history and physical examination 2. Pattern and number of decompensation 3. MELD, CTP, APRI, ALBI Score 4. Hemogram, Kidney function test, Liver function test, INR 5. Ultrasound abdomen with spleno-portal axis doppler / CECT upper abdomen

Interventions

DRUGDabigatran

Dabigatran 150 mg BD fixed dose to be given for duration of 6 months.

DRUGEnoxaparin

Enoxaparin . Treatment would be given with 1 mg /Kg (100IU/Kg) dose s/c twice daily for 6 months.

Sponsors

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>18 years 2. Cirrhosis with portal vein thrombosis within 6 months of diagnosis/Symptomatic PVT/PVT in potential transplant recipient.

Exclusion criteria

1. Contraindications to anticoagulant therapy, such as active bleeding, recent major surgery, or known hypersensitivity to study medications. 2. CTP \>10 3. Hepatocellular carcinoma 4. Tumoral PVT 5. Isolated gastric varices with red colour signs 6. Peptic ulcer disease with large ulcers 7. Pregnant or breastfeeding women 8. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<50,000/μL) 9. Patients with concurrent acute kidney injury or chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5 10. Those not giving consent for therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients achiving recanalization of Portal Vein Thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhosis patients at 6-months in both groups.6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of partial recanalization of Portal Vein Thrombosis in cirrhosis patients at 6-months in between groups.6 months
Rate of complete recanalization of Portal Vein Thrombosis in cirrhosis patients at 3-months in between groups.3 months
Rate of recurrence of Portal Vein Thrombosis at 12 months.12 months
Adverse events in both the groups till 6-months6 months
Change in CTP scores in both the groups over 12-months12-months
Rate of complete recanalization of Portal Vein Thrombosis in cirrhosis patients at 6-months in between groups.6 months
Variceal and non-variceal bleeding rates at 6-months and 12-months6-months and 12-months
Number of patients with worsening of decompensation events and new onset decompensation events in the two study groups till 12-months12-monthsDecompensation events includes any of the one ascites,HE,bleed and jaundice
Baseline parameters for predicting recanalisation of Portal Vein Thrombosis (PVT) at 6 months in both the groups.12 months
Baseline parameters for predicting rethrombosis of PVT at 12 months in both the groups.12 months
Change in MELD scores in both the groups over 12-months12-months

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactDr Sarthak Chanana, MD
xs2sarthak@gmail.com01146300000
Backup ContactDr Rajan V, DM
rajanvf40@gmail.com01146300000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026