Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Infusion of Terlipressin vs Bolus Terlipressin in ACLF Patients With Acute Esophageal Variceal Bleed

Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Infusion of Terlipressin vs Bolus Terlipressin in ACLF Patients With Acute Esophageal Variceal Bleed: Pilot Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06815770
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-02-07
Start date
2025-02-10
Completion date
2026-02-28
Last updated
2025-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute on Chronic Liver Failure

Brief summary

Acute portal hypertension, as measured by rapid rise in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) can lead to further dreaded complications, including acute variceal bleeding (AVB) AVB: 6-week mortality rates of around 15-20% in patients with chronic liver disease without ACLF.The overall prevalence of UGH in cirrhotic patients with AD was 34.4% and 35.7% in patients with ACLF.AVB is a well-recognized precipitant leading to the occurrence and development of ACLF. AVB is a well-recognized precipitant leading to the occurrence and development of ACLF. Medical therapy for esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) aims to reduce the splanchnic blood flow and portal pressure. The most common vasoactive agents include terlipressin, vasopressin, somatostatin, and octreotide.

Detailed description

Aim and Objective - To assess the safety and efficacy of continuous terlipressin vs. Bolus terlipressin in the management of acute esophageal variceal bleeding in ACLF. Study population: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with ACLF presenting with upper GI bleeding due to esophageal varices Study design: Pilot study Study period: 1 year Sample size: 60 Intervention: Group I- Intravenous terlipressin (administered as a continuous infusion at 4 mg/24 hours). After 12 hours, if the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) does not show a reduction of less than 10%, increase the dose to 6 mg/24 hours. Group II- Intravenous terlipressin (2 mg initially every 4 hourly for 2 days and then 1 mg every 4 hrs) Monitoring and assessment: All patients would undergo vital and baseline parameter screening before randomization. Based on randomization they will receive either steroid or plasma exchange followed by steroid Adverse effects: Acute Diarrhea, chest pain, Arterial hypertension, Cardiac arrhythmias, Acute abdomen Stopping rule: chest pain, alteration of ECG, cyanosis, bradycardia, severe allergic rashes

Interventions

Terlipressin Injectable Product

Sponsors

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with ACLF presenting with due to esophageal varices bleeding.

Exclusion criteria

1. Age \< 18 years 2. History of coronary heart disease or ventricular arrhythmia, 3. Stroke or transient ischemic attack, 4. Bronchial asthma, 5. Epilepsy, 6. Pregnancy, 7. Rebleeding. 8. HCC 9. Gastric variceal bleed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hepatic venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) reduction of more than 10% from baseline at 12-24 hours in both arms.12-24 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Terlipressin-related complications within 5 days i.e. safety of the drug5 days
Number of blood transfusions at 5 days5 days
Failure to control hemostasis5 days
Incidence of post-bleed Acute Kidney Injury within 5 days5 days
6 weeks mortality in both groups.6 weeks
Rebleed within 42 day42 days

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactDr Khushboo Yadav, MD
ky29277@gmail.com01146300000
Backup ContactDr Vinod S Arora, DM
VINOD_UCMS@yahoo.com01146300000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026