Skip to content

Evaluation of Doxycycline Nanoparticle With Gelatin Sponge on Immediate Implant in Esthetic Region

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Doxycycline and Doxycycline Loaded Nanoparticles With Gelatin Sponge on Immediate Implant Placement in Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06809829
Enrollment
16
Registered
2025-02-05
Start date
2025-02-28
Completion date
2027-02-28
Last updated
2025-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Immediate Implant Placement

Keywords

Immediate Implant Placement, Nanoparticles, Doxycycline, Gelatin Sponge

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to Evaluate the effect of Doxycycline nanoparticles along with gelatin sponge in immediate implant cases in esthetic zone. The main question it aims to answer is: Does the application of doxycycline nanoparticles with gelatin sponge improve the clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediate implant cases in esthetic zone? Researchers will compare eight patients undergoing immediate implant placement with the buccal gap filled with doxycycline loaded gelatin nanoparticles along with gelatin sponge (group A) with eight patients undergoing immediate implant placement with the buccal gap filled with doxycycline along with gelatin sponge (group B). to see if the doxycycline loaded nanoparticles will improve the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the immediate implant . Participants will \[describe the main tasks participants will be asked to do, interventions they'll be given and use bullets if it is more than 2 items\].

Interventions

PROCEDUREImmediate Implant Placement

Eight patients undergoing immediate implant placement with the buccal gap filled with doxycycline loaded gelatin nanoparticles along with gelatin sponge (group A) Eight patients undergoing immediate implant placement with the buccal gap filled with doxycycline along with gelatin sponge (group B)

Sponsors

Kafrelsheikh University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The presence of non-restorable single-rooted maxillary centrals, canines or premolars. * Sufficient bone volume. * Good oral hygiene. * The remaining space between the socket and the fixture equals or more than 2mm at the coronal third of the socket. * Sufficient bone width (≥ 1 mm) in the buccal plate of the remaining bone to place an implant confirmed by cone beam computer tomography (CBCT).

Exclusion criteria

* Insufficient bone volume. * Active infection. * Patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy. * Patients who have systemic disorders {uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, autoimmune disease, …etc}, * Pregnant patients, * Patients with bone diseases * Presence of periapical pathology affecting the neighbouring teeth. * Smokers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal (crestal) bone loss (MBL).after surgery and 6 months after surgeryRadiographic examination of the patients will be done firstly pre-operative then just after the surgical procedures as a base point and at six months follow-up period post-operative by using CBCT (carestream 9600). On Demand3D program will be used for image reconstruction and analysis. For the calculation of marginal (crestal) bone loss (MBL), the implant will be used as a reference by adjusting the cross-sectional long axis in the center of the implant and bisecting it. A line will be drawn parallel to the implant, starting at the crest of the bony cortical plate of bone and ending at the apical level of the implant; height will be recorded in millimeters immediately and 6 months postoperative. The same process will be repeated from the palatal direction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pink Esthetic Scorebefore the surgery, 3 months and 6 months after the surgeryThe patients will be photographed to measure the pink esthetic sore before the surgery, 3 months, and 6 months after the surgery.
Peri-Implant Periodontal Probing depth (PPD):3 months and 6 months after the surgeryThis index depends mainly on the usage of 0.5 mm Michigan O probe with graduations. Measurements will be evaluated at six sites per implant i.e., the disto-facial surface, mid facial surface, mesio-facial surface, mesio-lingual surface, mid lingual surface and disto-lingual surfaces of the implant. PPD will be measured by taking the reading from the free gingival margin to the base of the pocket. The mean score of the implant will be obtained by adding the six scores and dividing it by six. Measurements will be recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm six months after implant placement (prosthetic phase) and three months after the prosthesis placement.
Peri-implant vertical bone level.after surgery and 6 months after surgeryMeasurement will be carried out on four aspects (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) around all implants of the selected OPGs using CBCT (carestream 9600). On Demand3D program will be used for image reconstruction and analysis. The implant shoulder and the bone ridge will be used as reference points. The distance between the implant shoulder and the bone crest directly in contact with the implant will be measured with the ruler function. The presence of peri-implant bone defect will be determined by the percent of bone loss related to the length of the implant.
Implant stabilityat the time of surgery, 3 months and 6 months post surgeryThe transducer of the RFA device (Osstell®. Osstell, Baltimore) will be placed by hand tightening onto implant fixture. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) values will be measured both parallel and perpendicular to alveolar ridge of the jaw. The final ISQ value for each implant will be the mean of ISQ values. ISQ values will be measured again at re-entry after 3, 6 months for each implant.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026