Intraperitoneal Ketamine Versus Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery

Laparoscopic surgery, Ketamine, Bupivacaine, Intraperitoneal instillation, Cholecystectomy

The intraperitoneal approach is used in anesthesia to manage the pain associated with abdominal procedures. Few studies have been conducted comparing intraperitonela ketamine with bupivacaine for pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) patients. To compare effect of intraperitoneal ketamine versus bupivacaine for postoperative pain control after LC. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi. Group K received ketamine whereas Group B received bupivacaine. In Group K, ketamine 0.25mg/kg diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 40 ml was instilled by the surgeon. In Group B, bupivacaine 2mg/kgdiluted in normal saline to a total volume of 40ml was administered. Tramadol 1.5 mg/kg to a maximum of 100 mg IV was given as rescue analgesia. The pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero being no pain to ten being the worst possible pain. Pain was assessed using NRS at 0 hour (immediate postoperative period), 2 hour, 4 hour, 6 hour and 12 hours postoperatively.

Proper pain management encourages quick ambling, reduces the likelihood of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, enhances the patient's ability to breathe deeply, which reduces the possibility of pulmonary complications, and reduces tachycardia and the unnecessary investigations that are linked to it. Few studies have been conducted comparing intraperitoneal ketamine with bupivacaine for pain control in LC patients. Thus we planned the current study to compare effect of intraperitoneal ketamine versus bupivacaine for post-surgery pain control after LC. This double blinded randomized controlled trial was performed in Operation theatre, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan. The study was commenced with the institutional ethical approval. The study included all ASA I and II patients, male or female, aged 20 to 70, who were planned to undergo elective LC. Patients with known allergies to study drugs with any chronic pain condition, taking chronic pain medications, having psychiatric illness, weighing more than 80 kg, emergency surgery and converted to open cholecystectomy were excluded. Patients were enrolled with their written informed consent. Sample size of 46 per arm was estimated using online available calculator Open-Epi, by taking mean VAS score of 3.0±0.86 in ketamine group and 3.50±0.84 in bupivacaine group at 12 hour at power of 80% and 95% confidence interval. Patients were enrolled using a consecutive sampling procedure, while groups were assigned at random using opaque, sealed envelopes that were consecutively numbered. In Group K, ketamine 0.25mg/kg diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 40 ml was instilled by the surgeon, 20 ml before starting gall bladder dissection over the surgical site and liver while remaining 20 ml at the end of procedure after securing haemostasis over gall bladder bed and liver. In Group B, bupivacaine 2mg/kg diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 40ml was administered in similar way as described in Group K. Patients' demographic profile including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), clinical profile comorbidity, ASA grade, surgery duration and pain status were documented. Weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m) was the definition of BMI. Co-morbidities of patients was confirmed from previous medical records or evidence against medication to treat underlying condition.

Pakistan