Skip to content

Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years

Intraoral Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Indirect Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Direct Bulk Fill Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth After Using 2 Years: Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06807125
Enrollment
26
Registered
2025-02-04
Start date
2023-01-10
Completion date
2025-01-10
Last updated
2025-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Wear

Keywords

Wear measurements, resin matrix ceramic, Bulk fill composite, Digital scanner.

Brief summary

This clinical trial conducted to measure the amount of wear of opposing enamel to indirect milled resin matrix ceramic versus direct bulk fill resin composite intraorally using Digital Scanner after two years of using

Detailed description

Indirect milled resin matrix ceramic overlay versus direct bulk fill resin composite overlay was utilized in a clinical trial to compare the amount of enamel wear on endodontically treated molars using a Panda P2 digital scanner and Geomagic Control X 3D software. After one and two years, measurements of enamel wear were taken.

Interventions

PROCEDUREResin matrix ceramic block

Milled resin composite block for fabrication of permanent, indirect restorations using a CAD/CAM grinding process. shock absorbing affect due to the dentin- like modulus of elasticity makes BRILLIANT Crios will suited or indirect restoration.

Sponsors

Misr University for Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Blinding empowers the research to minimize threats to internal validity and strengthen the external validity. Our clinical trial was double blinding, the participant and the outcomes assessor were blinded while, the investigator cant be blinded as he worked with two different materials and techniques

Intervention model description

Randomized Clinical Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ● Patients with non vital badly decayed posterior teeth. * 18 -55years. * Males or Females. * Good oral hygiene. * Co-operative patients approving to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* High caries index. * Severe medical complications. * Pregnancy. * Allergic history concerning methacrylates Disabilities. * Heavy smoking. * Xerostomia. * Lack of compliance. * Evidence of parafunctional habits. * Temporomandibular joint disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amount of Enamel Weartwo years follow upamount of enamel wear measured through superimposition of STL files exported from intraoral scanner then using geomagic Control X 3D

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026