Skip to content

Post-Operative Use of FS2 to Mitigate Scarring in Burn Patients

Post-operative Topical Administration of Fibrosis Inhibiting Compound FS2 in a Double- Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Mitigation of Cutaneous Scarring in Skin Graft and Donor Sites in Burn Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06807021
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-02-04
Start date
2026-05-15
Completion date
2026-11-06
Last updated
2026-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burn Scar, Burn Wound

Keywords

Scar, Burn, skin graft, Kynurenic acid, FS2, Skin grafted wound, Donor Wound

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to see how an ingredient called kynurenic acid (which we named "FS2") affects scar formation in people with burn injuries that need skin graft surgery. A cream with FS2 will be used on both the area where the skin graft was placed and the area where the skin was taken (donor site). The cream will be applied after the skin has healed. This study will help us understand if FS2 is safe and effective for mitigating skin scar formation in burn patients.

Detailed description

For the first 90 days of the study, neither the patient nor the investigator will know which cream is being used: either the control cream (IP1) or the treatment cream (IP2), which contains 0.5% FS2. The assigned study product will be applied to the donor site and the skin graft site. After the first 90 days, all patients will use the FS2 cream for another 90 days in an open-label period where everyone knows they are receiving FS2. The graft and donor sites will be photographed and assessed (POSAS and VSS), scored and recorded at the initial visit and again at every assessment visit thereafter. An interim analysis will take place when about half of the participants (36 people) have finished their Day 90 visit. Based on the results, the study may continue as planned with the two-treatment, blinded design, or it may switch to an open-label format where all patients (those already in the study or newly enrolled) will use the FS2 cream. Oversight - Human Subjects Protection Review section continued: Site #02 (Edmonton) Approval Number: Pro00151882 Board Name: HREB - Biomedical Panel Board Affiliation: HREB - University of Alberta Board Contact Information: 780-492-8320 (Phone), vnadeau@ualberta.ca (Email)

Interventions

DRUGIP1 control cream (Vehicle base)

Without FS2

DRUGIP2 - 0.5% w/w FS2

FS2 in pharmaceutical compounding base

Sponsors

Birch BioMed Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Nutrasource Pharmaceutical and Nutraceutical Services, Inc.
CollaboratorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Intervention model description

Two-arm, parallel, vehicle-controlled, Randomized, Double-blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Medically able and willing to consent/assent to study requirements 2. Male and female burn patients 3. 12 to 65 years of age (inclusive) 4. Able to understand the study requirements and consent without a translator. Where applicable, participant's legally authorized representative (LAR) is willing and able to agree to the requirements and restrictions of the study, be willing to give voluntary informed consent (or assent, if capable), be able to understand and read the questionnaires, carry out all study-related procedures, and communicate effectively with the study staff. 5. Have a BMI between 15 and 35 kg/m2 (inclusive) 6. Have clinically acceptable results in the safety laboratory tests as deemed by the investigator 7. Have full thickness burn injury that required partial thickness skin graft (meshed or sheet) for any location other than the face and genitalia 8. Skin graft size is between 50 cm2 and 800 cm2 (post-meshing, if a meshed graft) 9. If skin graft is meshed, maximum skin graft expansion ratio is 1:1.5 10. Able to apply the IPs as instructed, whether by the participants themselves or their accompanying caregivers

Exclusion criteria

1. Medically unable to consent to study requirements 2. Treatment site(s) (skin graft site) located on the face and genitalia 3. Treatment site(s) (skin graft site and skin donor site) that has not reached complete re-epithelization at baseline, based on the investigator's assessment 4. Expected to be medically unstable for the duration of the study period and an additional 1-month thereafter 5. Pregnant, or attempting to become pregnant 6. Subjects who had taken part in an interventional clinical trial within 3 months prior to admission to this trial or who are currently participating in a clinical trial, whether an investigational drug was used or not 7. Subjects who had any clinical evidence of severe ongoing or prolonged depression or mental illness within the last year 8. Subjects who smoke more than 20 cigarettes a day 9. Subjects who have a history of heavy drinking in the past month, defined as more than 14 drinks per week for men or more than 7 drinks per week for women 10. Subjects who have a history of substance abuse within the 12 months prior to screening (including having been hospitalized for such in an in-patient or out-patient intervention) 11. Subjects with severe inhalation injury requiring FiO2 \>50%, renal failure requiring dialysis or hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressor therapy at the time of initiation of study treatment 12. Subjects who have scarring from previous interventions or evidence of thermal, electrical or radiation burn scars, tattoos, birthmarks or moles within 5 cm of the treatment sites 13. Subjects with a history of abnormal keloid scarring 14. Subjects with additional concurrent illnesses or conditions that may have interfered with wound healing like neoplastic, immune-mediated, or primary infectious disease (e.g. carcinoma, vasculitis, connective tissue disease, immune system disorders, uncontrolled HIV infection, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic renal impairment, significant hepatic impairment, inadequately or uncontrolled congestive heart failure or diabetes mellitus) or any clinically significant medical condition or history of any condition which may impair wound healing 15. Subjects with a skin disorder that is chronic or currently active and which the investigator considers will adversely affect the healing of acute wounds or will involve the areas to be examined in this trial (including psoriasis, dermatitis, eczema) 16. A history of radiotherapy to the study scar area 17. Subjects who have known sensitivity to any components of the IPs 18. Any other diagnosis, condition, physical or geographical limitation with the participant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Scar condition of the skin grafted wound on Day 90 as assessed by VSS90 daysTo evaluate the effect of 90-day FS2 cream use, compared to control, on clinician-assessed scar condition assessed by Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) at the skin grafted wound (Study Arm 1)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Scar condition of the donor skin graft harvest site on Day 90 as assessed by VSS90 daysTo evaluate the effect of 90-day FS2 cream use, compared to control, on clinician-assessed scar condition assessed by VSS at the donor skin graft harvest site (Study Arm 2)
Scar condition of the skin graft wound on Day 28 and Day 60 as assessed by VSSDay 28 and Day 60To evaluate the effect of 28- and 60-day FS2 cream use, compared to control, on clinician-assessed scar condition assessed by VSS at: skin grafted wound (Study Arm 1)
Scar condition of the donor skin graft harvest site on Day 28 and Day 60 as assessed by VSSDay 28 and Day 60To evaluate the effect of 28- and 60-day FS2 cream use, compared to control, on clinician-assessed scar condition assessed by VSS at: donor skin graft harvest site (Study Arm 2)
Scar condition of the skin grafted wound on Day 28, Day 60, and Day 90 as assessed by the Observer component of POSASDay 28, Day 60 and Day 90To evaluate the effect of 28-, 60- and 90-day FS2 cream use, compared to control, on clinician-assessed scar condition assessed by the Observer component of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) at skin grafted wound (Study Arm 1)
Scar condition of the donor skin graft harvest site on Day 28, Day 60, and Day 90 as assessed by the Observer component of POSASDay 28, Day 60 and Day 90To evaluate the effect of 28-, 60- and 90-day FS2 cream use, compared to control, on clinician-assessed scar condition assessed by (POSAS) at: donor skin graft harvest site (Study Arm 2)
Scar condition of the skin grafted wound on Day 28, Day 60, and Day 90 as assessed by the Patient component of POSASDay 28, Day 60 and Day 90To evaluate the effect of 28-, 60- and 90-day FS2 cream use, compared to control, on patient-reported scar condition at: skin grafted wound (Study Arm 1)
Scar condition of the donor skin graft harvest site on Day 28, Day 60, and Day 90 as assessed by the Patient component of POSASDay 28, Day 60 and Day 90To evaluate the effect of 28-, 60- and 90-day FS2 cream use, compared to control, on patient-reported scar condition at: donor skin graft harvest site (Study Arm 2)
Scar condition of the skin grafted wound on Day 120 and Day 180 as assessed by the Observer component of POSASDay 120 and Day 180To evaluate the effect of 30- and 90-day FS2 cream use, starting 90 days after skin grafted wound's complete re-epithelization, on clinician-assessed scar condition at: skin grafted wound (Study Arm 1) - POSAS
Scar condition of the donor skin graft harvest site on Day 120 and Day 180 as assessed by the Observer component of POSASDay 120 and Day 180To evaluate the effect of 30- and 90-day FS2 cream use, starting 90 days after skin grafted wound's complete re-epithelization, on clinician-assessed scar condition at: donor skin graft harvest site (Study Arm 2) - POSAS
Scar condition of the skin grafted wound on Day 120 and Day 180 as assessed by VSSDay 120 and Day 180To evaluate the effect of 30- and 90-day FS2 cream use, starting 90 days after skin grafted wound's complete re-epithelization, on clinician-assessed scar condition at: skin grafted wound (Study Arm 1) - VSS
Scar condition of the donor skin graft harvest site on Day 120 and Day 180 as assessed by VSSDay 120 and Day 180To evaluate the effect of 30- and 90-day FS2 cream use, starting 90 days after skin grafted wound's complete re-epithelization, on clinician-assessed scar condition at: donor skin graft harvest site (Study Arm 2) - VSS
Scar condition of the skin grafted wound on Day 120 and Day 180 as assessed by the Patient component of POSASDay 120 and Day 180To evaluate the effect of 30- and 90-day FS2 cream use, starting 90 days after skin grafted wound's complete re-epithelization, on patient-reported scar condition at: skin grafted wound (Study Arm 1) -POSAS
Scar condition of the donor skin graft harvest site on Day 120 and Day 180 as assessed by the Patient component of POSASDay 120 and Day 180To evaluate the effect of 30- and 90-day FS2 cream use, starting 90 days after skin grafted wound's complete re-epithelization, on patient-reported scar condition at: donor skin graft harvest site (Study Arm 2) - POSAS
Quality of life on Day 28, Day 60, and Day 90 as assessed by the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B)Day 28, Day 60 and Day 90To evaluate the effect of 28-, 60- and 90-day FS2 cream use, compared to control, on burn injury-related quality of life
Quality of life on Day 120 and Day 180 as assessed by BSHS-BDay 120 and Day 180Quality of life on Day 120 and Day 180 as assessed by BSHS-B To evaluate the effect of 30- and 90-day FS2 cream use, starting 90 days after skin grafted wound's complete re-epithelization, on burn injury-related quality of life in those randomized to control for the first 90 days of study

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTAdam Kuttenkeuler
akuttenkeuler@nutrasource.ca+1519-341-3367
CONTACTStephanie Recker
srecker@nutrasource.ca1-887-557-7722
STUDY_DIRECTORCarlos Camozzi, MD, PHD

BirchBioMed Inc.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 5, 2026