Skip to content

Axillary Vein Cannulation: 'Hockey' Probe Versus Linear Probe

Comparing Axillary Vein Cannulation with 'Hockey' Probe Versus Linear Probe for Central Venous Access

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06805279
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-02-03
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2024-07-01
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CVC, Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Cannulation

Brief summary

Central venous catheterization, specifically through the axillary vein, is a procedure of critical importance in various clinical contexts. Site selection is dependent on clinical assessment, experience and the physician preference. This study aims to evaluate the potential advantages of using the hockey stick ultrasonography probe for axillary vein cannulation and determine whether this probe enhances axillary vein imaging, accelerates the central vein cannulation procedure and reduces the rate of complications compared to the linear probe. Methods: 100 participants were recruited and allocated into two groups: the linear probe group and the hockey stick probe group. All procedures were performed by two senior anesthesia and intensive care residents, each with experience of over 100 central vascular access procedures. Follow-up chest X-rays were taken two hours post-procedure to verify the correct position of the catheter and to rule out complications such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, cardiac tamponade, and incorrect line placement.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAxillary Vein Cannulation

This study aims to evaluate the potential advantages of using the hockey stick ultrasonography probe for axillary vein cannulation and determine whether this probe enhances axillary vein imaging, accelerates the central vein cannulation procedure and reduces the rate of complications compared to the linear probe

Sponsors

Medical University of Warsaw
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age above 18 years old * scheduled for elective central venous catheter in the axillary vein

Exclusion criteria

* medical contraindication for axillary vein cannulation (coagulation abnormalities, local skin infection or chest wall deformation) * patient consent decline

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success on first attempt24 hoursAn attempt is defined by every needle direction change. Whenever vein puncture was not achieved by a simple, straight movement without any change of direction in any plane this cannulation was not counted as success at first attempt
Number attempts24 hoursAn attempt is defined by every needle direction change. Whenever vein puncture was not achieved by a simple, straight movement without any change of direction in any plane this cannulation was not counted as success at first attempt
Procedure Time24 hoursThe procedure time measurement stops when skin dressing is applied. Time measurement was done by an independent observer.
Cumulative number of complications24 hoursComplications early and late were recorded either with ultrasonography immedi-ately after the procedure or in the chest X-ray 2 hours after.

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026