Skip to content

The Safety and Efficacy of Combined Microwave Ablation During Limb-sparing Surgery in High-risk Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients

The Safety and Efficacy of Combined Microwave Ablation During Limb-sparing Surgery in High-risk Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06802510
Enrollment
44
Registered
2025-01-31
Start date
2018-01-21
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ablation Techniques, Microwave, Sarcoma

Keywords

sarcoma, microwave ablation, limb-sparing surgery

Brief summary

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with a high risk of recurrence when invading surrounding structures, and the optimal treatment strategy for safe surgical margin is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined local inactivation by ablation in STS during limb-sparing surgery in high-risk STS patients.

Detailed description

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with a high risk of recurrence when invading surrounding structures, and the optimal treatment strategy for safe surgical margin is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined local inactivation by ablation in STS during limb-sparing surgery in high-risk STS patients. Investigators collected data retrospectively from participants diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma who were treated at a tertiary medical institution from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022. This study was approved by the hospital's Ethics Committee (XJS2022-101-01), and all participants provided written informed consent. The participants were divided into two groups (MWA and control group). The MWA group received surgical resection combined with local lesion inactivation by MWA, while the control group underwent standard surgical resection alone. Non-specified sarcomas are treated with the AI(Doxorubicin+Ifosfamide) chemotherapy regimen, while Ewing's sarcoma is treated with the standard recommended VDC ((Vincristine + Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide)/IE(Ifosfamide + Etoposide) chemotherapy regimen.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMicrowave Ablation

The MWA group followed a similar resection procedure as the control group. The area of ablation was evaluated strictly by radiologists and surgeons according to the following criteria: 1) Areas of tumor response, progression, or suspicious invasion (intermediate-high signal and edema range in T2) were assessed. Wide margins of at least 2-3 cm or more were obtained over the normal tissue around the tumor. Ablation margins were covered using a microwave ablation array with antennas (Microwave Ablation System BD-GT, Baird Medical LLC), aimed at completely inactivating the tumor in situ. Ablation needles were strategically arranged to form a matrix covering the target zone. The ablation time and power were determined based on the extent of the lesion, ensuring the temperature of the ablation area remained between 70-80°C. A 50 ml syringe was used to continuously drip and spray ice-cold saline to keep surrounding tissue temperatures below 40-43°C.

Sponsors

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Retrospective controlled study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Pathologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma (FNCLCC grade G2-G3); 2. MRI/CT confirmed tumor invasion beyond anatomical compartments, joint involvement, or encroachment on surrounding tissues (bones, muscle, etc.); 3. After being fully informed of the risks, the patient strongly refuses amputation or wide resection, which leads to irreversible impaired function. 4. Good physical condition, able to tolerate surgery;

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with distant metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis; 2. Patients with missing clinical or follow-up data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival (OS)From date of diagnosis until the date of documented death, assessed up to 5 years (up to 5 year)Overall survival was defined as the time from diagnosis to last follow-up or death.
progression-free survival (PFS)From date of surgery until the date of first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to 5 yearsprogression-free survival (PFS) was the time from surgery to disease progression or death
Local disease-free survival (DFS)From date of surgery until the date of first documented local tumor recurrence, assessed up to 5 yearsLocal disease-free survival (DFS) was the time for local tumor recurrence after surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative complicationsPost-operation 3 monthsSerious postoperative complications were recorded according to CTCAE 4.0, including severe wound healing problems, deep infections, bone necrosis, wound burn, persistent pain, and major neurovascular injuries.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026