Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Conditions
Keywords
laparoscopy, v-notes lateral suspension, pelvic organ prolapse
Brief summary
Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and V-NOTES Lateral Suspension with the Salman Ketenci Gencer Technique
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with stage 3 or 4 pelvic organ prolapse Sexually active patients
Exclusion criteria
* Cervical pathology History of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or conization Presence of vaginal, pelvic, or adnexal mass Suspicious abdominal malignancy Morbid obesity Any pelvic infection Signs of pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Improvement in Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Severity by POP-Q Score | 6 months | POP-Q measurements assess the degree of pelvic organ prolapse in patients, using a combined system that includes multiple parameters to evaluate the anterior and posterior vaginal walls, cervix, and vaginal vault. This study will compare the POP-Q values of patients following laparoscopic lateral suspension and V-Notes lateral suspension with the Salmanketencigencer technique to assess improvements in prolapse severity. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Contacts
Primary ContactFatma Ketenci Gencer, Associate Professor
Backup ContactHavva Betül Bacak, Specialist
Outcome results
None listed