Skip to content

Evaluation Of Three Different Anagesic Techniques In Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fixation Surgery

EVALUATION OF POSTOPERATIVE EFFECT OF THREE DIFFERENT ANALGESIC TECHNIQUES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LUMBAR FIXATION SURGERY USING SALIVARY OPIORPHIN LEVEL: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06801574
Enrollment
84
Registered
2025-01-30
Start date
2025-02-01
Completion date
2026-03-01
Last updated
2025-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Fixation Surgery

Keywords

lumbar fixation surgery, erector spinal plane block, local infiltration

Brief summary

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a degenerative condition characterized by the narrowing of the space surrounding the neurovascular structures of the lumbar vertebrae, resulting from age-related changes in the intervertebral discs, ligamentum flavum, and facet joints. It commonly causes unilateral pain in the lower back, hips, and legs, often described as cramping or burning. Postoperative pain management in these cases frequently involves oral opioids or intravenous administration using patient-controlled analgesia devices. However, opioids are associated with side effects such as reduced gastrointestinal motility, urinary retention, and respiratory depression. To mitigate these issues, local anesthetic wound infiltration is widely employed by surgeons to manage postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption following lumbar spinal surgeries. The primary aim of this study is to compare the postoperative efficacy of three different analgesic methods in patients undergoing elective lumbar fixation surgery, using the percentage change in salivary opiorphin levels as a marker. Additionally, the study seeks to evaluate the correlation between these changes and postoperative pain scores, as well as the amount of opioids consumed.

Interventions

OTHERErector Spinae Plane Block

After the surgical team places the final suture, while the patient is in the prone position, an ultrasound-guided ESP (Erector Spinae Plane) block will be administered bilaterally using a block needle. A total of 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected.

OTHERinfiltration

Before the surgical team closes the incision, local infiltration with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be performed at the surgical site.

Sponsors

Ataturk University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled to undergo lumbar fixation surgery under general anesthesia * aged between 18 and 65 years, * American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification of I-II

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a known allergy to local anesthetics. * Patients who used opioid analgesics within 48 hours prior to sample collection. * Patients with a history of smoking or alcohol consumption. * Patients with conditions affecting salivary flow, such as xerostomia or those who have undergone radiotherapy. * Patients with infectious diseases known to be transmissible through saliva. * Patients with an ASA physical status classification of III or higher. * Patients unable to use a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. * Patients who do not consent to the study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the Postoperative Efficacy of Analgesic Methods Using Salivary Opiorphin Levelspostoperative 24 hoursThe primary aim of this study is to compare the postoperative efficacy of three different analgesic methods applied to patients undergoing elective lumbar fixation surgery by assessing the percentage change in salivary opiorphin levels. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate the correlation of these changes with postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores and the amount of opioids consumed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total amount of opioid consumptionPostoperative 24 hoursthe secondary objective was to measure the total amount of opioid consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively
Pain scores in first 24 hours at rest and at movementpostoperative 24 hoursEvaluation of pain scores during movement and rest within 24 hours postoperatively using the Visual Analog Scale
Correlation between basal Salivary Opiorphin Levels and total 24 hours opioid consumption and pain scorespostoperative 24 hoursThe correlation between basal salivary opiorphin levels and total 24-hour opioid consumption, as well as pain scores will be analyzed to reveal any correlation

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactFeyza Simsek
feyzasimsek0205@gmail.com+90 554 947 52 61
Backup ContactCanan Atalay
+90 (533) 363 53 18

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026