Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube vs. no Endotracheal Tube

Comparison of Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube to no Endotracheal Tube in EBUS-TBNA Procedure Under Moderate Sedation

Status

Terminated

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06799455

Enrollment

Registered

2025-01-29

Start date

2025-06-02

Completion date

2026-06-10

Last updated

2026-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Pulmonary Diseases

Brief summary

This is a comparison of uncuffed endotracheal tube (UCETT) vs. no endotracheal tube (ETT) in endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure under moderate sedation in terms of procedure tolerance, duration of the procedure, desaturation, amount of sedation medication usage.

Interventions

DEVICEEndotracheal tube

participants either receive the ETT during the procedure

Study design

Allocation

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Masking

NONE

Intervention model description

Patient will be randomized 1:1 to UCETT vs no ETT (current standard procedure) when they scheduled for the EBUS-TBNA procedure.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Any patient that is scheduled for EBUS-TBNA procedure

Exclusion criteria

* Those who are not safe to receive moderate sedation or flexible bronchoscopy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Desaturation	During the procedure	Whether a patient will experience any desaturation

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORH. Erhan Dincer

University of Minnesota

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 19, 2026