Skip to content

Auricular VNS Following Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Following Intracerebral Hemorrhage (IHC) to Mitigate ICH-induced Inflammation and Cerebral Edema

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06799390
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-01-29
Start date
2025-04-06
Completion date
2032-02-09
Last updated
2026-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Keywords

vagal nerve stimulation, pathologic processes, intracerebral hemmorrhage, cerebrovascular disorders, brain diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Vascular Diseases, Hemorrhage

Brief summary

This study will evaluate whether non-invasive auricular vagal nerve stimulation lowers inflammatory markers, and improves outcomes following intracerebral hemorrhage.

Detailed description

Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) has been studied as a novel method of reducing inflammation, and it has been successfully used in animal models of inflammatory conditions. The purpose of the proposed study is to determine if transcutaneous auricular VNS will impact inflammatory markers in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, and how it impacts their clinical course and outcomes. This study will involve randomizing patients to stimulation with VNS, or sham stimulation. Blood and CSF will be collected on admission, and serially throughout the patient's admission. Clinical events tracked during the hospital stay include the development of peri-hematomal edema, interventions for edema (medical or surgical), and intensive care unit and hospital stay. Outcomes following admission will include functional scores at discharge, and at follow-up visits for up to 2 years after discharge. No additional appointments will be made specially for the research study.

Interventions

Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation

Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve ear clip applied without current

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

All participants will be fitted with an auricular stimulator, but blinded to whether they are receiving stimulation or not. Outcome scores will be assessed and recorded by clinicians blinded to treatment arm.

Intervention model description

Participants are assigned to either stimulation or sham stimulation arms

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients who present with a spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) to Barnes Jewish Hospital

Exclusion criteria

* Patients \< 18 years old * Patients with a presumed traumatic etiology for their ICH, infratentorial location, ICH volume \> 60 ml or \< 10 ml, at risk of imminent death (e.g. Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS of 3 or one or more pupils unreactive), surgical intervention imminently planned (not including ventriculostomy) * Patients undergoing active cancer therapy * Patients with sustained bradycardia on arrival with a heart rate \< 50 beats per minute. * Patients who cannot be enrolled within 48 hours of the initial bleed.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the inflammatory marker IL-6 in plasma14 daysBlood samples collected on days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 14 (Day 1 serves as baseline, prior to first treatment). Inflammatory markers will be reported in pg/mL.
Growth of perihematomal edema14 daysChange in edema extension distance (baseline vs. peak) will be compared between groups, via quantitative assessment of serial computed tomography (CT) scans obtained on day 1, 4, 7, 10, and 14 (Day 1 serves as baseline, prior to first treatment).
Neurological worseningThrough hospital admission, average 14 daysOccurrence of clinical deterioration due to edema by criteria of 1) a reduction in GCS by 2 points or greater that persists for at least one hour, 2) worsening focal neurological deficits (NIHSS increase by at least 4 points), excluding other causes, or 3) need for surgical intervention or medical treatments for edema (osmotic therapies).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in additional inflammatory markers in plasma14 daysBlood samples collected on days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 14 to evaluate for IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17a, GM-CSF, IFN gamma, and TNF-α. Inflammatory markers will be reported in pg/mL.
Change in inflammatory markers in cerebrospinal fluid14 daysCerebrospinal fluid samples collected on days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 14 to evaluate for IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17a, GM-CSF, IFN gamma, and TNF-α. Inflammatory markers will be reported in pg/mL.
Relative perihematomal edema14 daysRelative perihematomal edema volume, the ratio of perihematoma volume to intracerebral hematoma volume
Neurological outcome2 yearsModified Rankin Scale for Neurological Disability (minimum score 0, maximum score 6, better outcomes have lower scores)
Hospital length of stayThrough hospital admission, average 14 daysTotal length of stay in the hospital, and in the intensive care unit

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTRaj Dhar, MD
dharr@wustl.edu314-362 2999
STUDY_CHAIREric Leuthardt, MD MBA

Washington University School of Medicine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 7, 2026