Skip to content

Feasibility and Safety of Additional Injection of Autologous Platelet-rich Stroma to Surgical Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistulas

Feasibility and Safety of Additional Injection of Autologous Platelet-rich Stroma to Surgical Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistulas

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06798935
Acronym
PRS-RVF
Enrollment
21
Registered
2025-01-29
Start date
2019-01-11
Completion date
2024-09-04
Last updated
2025-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anovaginal Fistula, Rectovaginal Fistula

Keywords

rectovaginal fistula, anovaginal fistula, platelet-rich stroma, stromal vascular fraction, platelet-rich plasma, autologous, cell therapy

Brief summary

Is the addition of platelet-rich stroma (PRS) injection, a form of autologous call therapy, to surgical treatment for rectovaginal fistula feasible and safe? The primary endpoints of this study are feasibility and safety until 12 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints include rates of clinical and radiological closure, recurrence rates after clinical or radiological closure and unplanned re-interventions within 12-month post-surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREautologous platelet-rich stroma

Autologous platelet-rich stroma, which is the combined product of stromal vascular fraction and platelet-rich plasma

Sponsors

IJsselland ziekenhuis
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective cohort study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients presenting with significant symptoms of a rectovaginal fistula (RVF) * RVF confirmed on imaging or with a high suspicion based on imaging findings (magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\] and/or endoanal ultrasound \[EUS\])

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with active proctitis * Patients with the presence of associated (not properly drained)) pelvic abscess * Patients with immune suppressed status * Patients with hematological disorders * Patients with any oncological event in the five years prior to study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patietns with feasible PRS injection1 day (day of surgery)Feasibility was assessed by the ability to successfully obtain SVF and PRP and to inject the combined product (i.e. PRS) during the procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients with safe PRS injection30 days postoperativelySafety was assessed by documenting the number of (serious) adverse events related to PRS injection within 30 days postoperatively. In addition, we report on number of serious fistula-related emergency room (ER) visits and number of readmissions within 30 days postoperatively.
Number of patients with clinical closure12 monthsclosure of the vaginal fistula opening without complaints of discharge at physical examination
Number of re-interventions12 months) the need for unplanned re-interventions due to residual clinical and/or radiological fistulizing disease or recurrent disease
Number of patients with radiological healing12 monthsradiological healing or radiological improvement, based on available MRI reports
Number of patients with recurrence12 monthsthe reopening of the vaginal fistula opening after clinical closure and/or radiological healing

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026