Skip to content

Evaluation of Band-Loop Space Maintainers Produced With Three-Dimensional Printer and Conventional Technique

Evaluation of Clinical Success and Changes in Periodontal Tissues of Band-Loop Space Maintainers Produced With Three-Dimensional Printer and Conventional Technique

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06798090
Enrollment
27
Registered
2025-01-29
Start date
2024-10-15
Completion date
2026-05-30
Last updated
2025-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

3D Printing, Dental Health, Pediatric Dentistry, Space Maintainer

Keywords

three dimensional printer, band and loop space maintainer, digital dentistry, PLAP-1, TNF-a

Brief summary

Our research is planned as a randomised clinical trial. The main aim of our study is to evaluate the clinical success of band and loop space maintainers produced by three-dimensional printer and conventional technique and the changes they cause in periodontal tissues.

Detailed description

Participants will be selected by simple random selection from systemically healthy children who will need bilateral lower deciduous first molar extraction and space maintainer application from patients who apply to Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics for treatment. The study will be carried out in a split-mouth design, and it is planned to place a band and loop space maintainer produced by conventional technique on one side and a band and loop space maintainer produced with a three-dimensional printer on the other side in the lower jaw. The clinical success of these two appliances and the changes in periodontal tissues will be compared. In order to evaluate the clinical success, the survival of the appliances and the determined failure criteria (Dissolution of the bonding cement, Separation/breakage from solder area, Embedding of the space maintainer inside towards the gum, Loop distortion/breakage, Inflammation of the gingiva adjacent to/around the space maintainer, Plaque accumulation around the band) will be taken into consideration. In order to evaluate the effects on periodontal tissues, pocket depth, plaque index values, gingival index values will be recorded and PLAP-1 and TNF-a levels in the gingival groove fluid will be examined for more detailed periodontal examination. The total planned follow-up period is 18 months, with patients invited for follow-up appointments at six-month intervals. Evaluations will be made at the end of the study with repeated measurements at baseline and control sessions.

Interventions

DEVICEBand and Loop Space Maintainer Produced with Three-Dimensional Printer

Band and loop space maintainer produced with three-dimensional printer using micro laser sinterisation method

DEVICEBand and Loop Space Maintainer Produced with Conventional Technique

Band and loop space maintainer produced with conventional methods

Sponsors

Aydin Adnan Menderes University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Systemically healthy children * Bilateral early loss of deciduous first molar teeth in the lower jaw * Presence of radiographically confirmed permanent tooth germ under the extracted deciduous tooth * Radiographically determined 1,5 mm minimum of bone existence above the permanent tooth germ * Existence of flush terminal plane/mesial step in decidious dentition and Angle class 1 molar relationship in mixed dentition * Existence of radiographically and clinically healthy abutment teeth * Frankl score 3 and 4 children

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with systemic diseases * Frankl score 1 and 2 children

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of periodontal tissue changes around both space maintainers according to the periodontal pocket depth measuringUp to 18 monthsThe pocket depth will be measured by probing the six sides of the teeth (mesio-buccal, mesio-lingual, disto-buccal, disto-lingual, mid-buccal, mid-lingual).
Evaluation of periodontal tissue changes around both space maintainers according to the gingival index valuesUp to 18 monthsIn order to evaluate the effects of both space maintainers on periodontal tissues, gingival index values will be recorded at baseline, 6th, 12th and 18th months. Gingival index, scores from 0 to 3 where 0 no inflammation, 1slight redness no bleeding on probing, 2 redness and bleeding on probing, and 3 severe inflammation with edema and ulceration to spontaneous bleeding.
Evaluation of periodontal tissue changes around both space maintainers with gingival groove fluid examinationBaseline and 6.monthFor detailed periodontal evaluation, PLAP-1 and TNF-a levels in the gingival groove fluid will be examined at the baseline and 6th month visits. Gingival groove fluid samples will be taken from two separate points of the teeth which the bands of the band and loop space maintainers' had been placed, with PerioPaper strips. Afterwards, the strips taken from each tooth will be packaged separately in eppendorf tubes and stored at -80 degrees until it is time to evaluate. The samples will be evaluated by ELISA tests then the results will be compared.
Clinical successUp to 18 monthsThe clinical success rate of appliances in terms of survival time by checking both space maintainers for these failure criteria: Dissolution of the bonding cement, loop distortion/breakage, separation/breakage from solder area ( for soldered conventional band and loop space maintainer).
Evaluation of periodontal tissue changes around both space maintainers according to Plaque index valuesUp to 18 monthsPlaque index, that is running in a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 means no plaque,1 film of plaque adhering to free gingival margin,2 moderate accumulation of soft deposits on the tooth and gingival margin, and 3 means abundance of soft debris.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing the two impression methods in terms of patient satisfaction.Immediately after the impression procedureTwo different impression methods will be used for the two techniques in the impression phase required for the production of the space maintainers. For the appliance to be produced with a three-dimensional printer, digital impressions will be taken with 3Shape intraoral scanner. For the conventional space maintainer production, impressions will be taken with traditional impression spoons using alginate material. With the help of a Likert scale from 1 to 5(with the help of smiley faces), the satisfaction levels of the children about the impression phases will be measured right after the impression process finished.
Measuring space maintaining efficiencyUp to18 monthsWith the help of a digital caliper, the contact points of the teeth adjacent to the extraction space will be measured and the effective protection of the space will be monitored. First measurement will be done right before the space maintainers' placement. The caliper measurement will be repeated at the 6th, 12th and 18th months.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactSultan Keles, Associate Proffesor
dtsultank@gmail.com+905318438557
Backup ContactÖzgün Öztürk
ozgun.ozturk.96@gmail.com+905347429962

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026