Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficacy of Chemical Genicular Nerve Neurolysis Using Alcohol or Phenol Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Under Ultrasound Guidance for Pain Management in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Comparison of the Efficacy of Chemical Genicular Nerve Neurolysis Using Alcohol or Phenol Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Under Ultrasound Guidance for Pain Management in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06798038
Enrollment
105
Registered
2025-01-29
Start date
2025-03-01
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2025-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Assessment of Knee Function Using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Assessment of Pain Intensity Using 10-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-10)(9)Immediately After Intervention , 1 Week,1month,3 Months,6months and One Year, Knee Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

Chronic knee pain is a common condition that affects many people, particularly those with knee osteoarthritis. It can limit mobility, reduce the quality of life, and increase the risk of falling . There are various treatment options for chronic knee osteoarthritis pain, including medications, physical therapy and surgery. Topical and oral analgesic medications and physical therapy, are often used in this population but with variable success and often wanting pain relief over time as the condition progresses. Patients who fail medical treatment often undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) However, there are significant comorbidities associated with TKA, and most of patients suffer with chronic knee pain after this surgery Furthermore, a subset of patients are unable to undergo TKA because of medical comorbidities. One alternative treatment option is genicular nerve ablation, which involves destroying nerves that carry pain signals from the knee joint to the brain. Genicular nerve ablation can be performed using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or chemical agents such as phenol. Both methods aim to provide long-term pain relief and functional improvement in patients with chronic knee pain(4). Chemical neurolytics, such as alcohol or phenol, have come to the fore because of their low cost and ease of application compared to radiofrequency ablation.These methods can be easily applied with ultrasound (US) guidance, which allows precise targeting of the relevant nerves. However, there is a lack of literature on appropriate agents and dose selection issues . Radiofrequency neurolysis (RFN) of the genicular nerves, which provides innervation to the capsule of the knee joint, as well as to the intra-articular and extra-articular ligaments, have been of considerable interest as an effective technique to alleviated knee osteoarthritis pain .However, it requires expensive specialized equipment and trained personnel, which may not be available or affordable in some settings.

Interventions

DEVICEradiofrequency ablation

35 Patients will be undergo for radiofrequency ablation which will be applied to each genicular nerve.

35 Patients will be administered with 2.0 ml of 6% phenol solution prepared from crystallized phenol per genicular nerve

DRUGalcohol neurolysis

35 Patients will be administered with 1.0ml of 70% alcohol per genicular nerve

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The following will be the criteria for inclusion, (105) patients older than 18 years with moderate to severe knee pain due to knee osteoarthritis (pain of intensity six or more on a numeric rating scale \[NRS\], persistent pain for more than six months, grade III or IV osteoarthritis in the radiological Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification (5-11), and failure to manage pain with conservative methods such as analgesics, intra-articular injection, and physical therapy.

Exclusion criteria

* • Patients' refusal to participate in the study. * History of intra-articular injection within three months before or after the procedure. * Coagulopathy and anticoagulant use. * Systemic disease as: renal or hepatic insufficiency. * Unable to communicate with the patient. * Implantable device. * Previous knee surgery. * Knee pain due to causes other than knee osteoarthritis (such as meniscopathy, trauma, spine disorder).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of pain intensity using 10-point numerical rating scale (NRS-10)immediately after intervention , 1 week,1month,3 months,6months and one year.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of Knee function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)immediately after intervention , 1 week,1month,3 months,6months and one year.
2- Assessment of the side effects and complications of these methods as (paresthesia, motor deficits, pain during application and increase in pain)immediately after intervention , 1 week,1month,3 months,6months and one year.

Contacts

Primary ContactTanta University
support_net@unv.tanta.edu.eg0020403317928

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026