Induction of Labour
Conditions
Keywords
misoprostol, induction of labour, dinoprostone
Brief summary
The objective of this interventional study is to compare the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with two commonly used methods of labor induction: low-dose oral misoprostol and the vaginal delivery system with dinoprostone. The study aims to identify the most suitable induction method for specific subgroups of patients based on parity, body mass index (BMI), age, and cervical ripeness, as well as assess patient preferences for these induction methods.
Interventions
DRUGdinoprostone vaginal delivery system
Pregnant women in this group will receive a vaginal delivery system containing 10 mg of dinoprostone for labor induction.
DRUGlow dose peroral misoprostol
Participants will be induced with a low-dose oral formulation of misoprostol, administered per protocol at 25 mcg every 2 hours
Sponsors
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Gestational age between 37 0/7 and 42 0/7 weeks * Singleton pregnancy * Viable fetus in cephalic presentation * Bishop score ≤ 6 * Maximum parity of three * Reactive CTG at admission without pathological findings
Exclusion criteria
* Age \< 18 years * Gestational age \< 37 0/7 weeks * Active labor * Spontaneous rupture of membranes * Non-reassuring CTG findings * Suspected infection (e.g., fever \> 38°C, chorioamnionitis, or unexplained systemic infection) * Contraindications to vaginal delivery or prostaglandin use * Previous cesarean delivery or uterine surgery involving entry into the uterine cavity * Significant fetal abnormalities * Severe fetal growth restriction with an estimated fetal weight below the 3rd percentile * Non-Slovenian-speaking participants
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time from induction to delivery | 1 week from induction | The time from the insertion of the vaginal delivery system or administration of the oral tablet to the time of delivery |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time from induction to spontaneos vaginal delivery | 1 week from induction | The time from the insertion of the vaginal delivery system or administration of the oral tablet to the time of spontaneous vaginal delivery |
| Time from induction to onset of active labour | 1 week from induction | The investigators will measure the time from the insertion of the vaginal delivery system or administration of the oral tablet to the onset of active labor, defined as the occurrence of strong contractions every 5 minutes. |
| Use of oxytocin and its dosage | 1 week from induction | The investigators will compare the need for oxytocin administration and its dosage, measured in international units (IU). |
| Use of analgesia during labour | 1 week from induction | The need for epidural analgesia, remifentanil, N₂O, no analgesia. |
| Type of delivery | 1 week from induction | Vaginal birth, Caesarean birth, Vacuum extraction |
| Hyperstimulation with nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing | 1 week from induction | Rate of uterine hyperstimulation- exaggerated uterine response consisting of uterine hypertonus, a single uterine contraction lasting two or more minutes or uterine tachysystole with a least 12 contractions in 20 minutes, with a simultaneous nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing as defined by the 2015 FIGO (The international federation of gynaecology and obstetrics) classification of intrapartum cardiotocography. |
| Duration of labour | 1 week from induction | Time from the onset of labor (regular contraction every 5 minutes) to the delivery of the baby |
| Postpartum hemorrhage above 1000 mL | 1 week from induction | The investigators will assess whether participants experience blood loss exceeding 1000 mL during delivery and within the first 3 hours postpartum. |
| Number of participants with fourth degree tear of perineum during labour | 1 week from induction | The investigators will observe the occurrence of fourth-degree perineal tears during labor. A fourth-degree tear involves injury to the anal sphincter complex (EAS and IAS) as well as the anorectal mucosa. |
| Side effects of misoprostol and dinoprostone | 1 week from induction | The investigators will monitor for the occurrence of the following side effects: nausea, vomiting, high fever, discomfort, diarrhea, and allergic reactions. |
| Number of newborns wtih 5-minute APGAR score of less than 7 | 1 week from induction | Infants with a 5-minute APGAR score of less than 7.The Apgar score is a number calculated by scoring the heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, skin color, and reflex irritability of the infant, 5 min after birth. Each of these objective signs can receive 0, 1, or 2 points. The higher is the sum of the points, the better is the condition of the newborn. 5-minute APGAR score of less than 7. |
| pH from umbilical artery | 1 week from induction | A sample will be taken from the umbilical artery after birth for pH analysis. |
| Number of newborns admitted to intensive care unit | 3 weeks from induction | Infants which will be admitted to the neonatal intensive unit for whatever reason. |
| Satisfaction with induction | 1 week from induction | All participants will complete questionnaires designed to assess whether they experienced any feelings of coercion or undue pressure when consenting to labor induction. These surveys will include four questions specifically focused on labor induction, with responses measured using a Likert scale. The questionnaires will be administered after participants have agreed to proceed with the induction process. |
| Satisfaction with childbirth | 3 weeks from induction | The second questionnaire, the validated Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ2), assesses satisfaction with the labor and delivery process. Participants will complete the CEQ2 within the first three days postpartum while still admitted to the maternity ward. The survey comprises 22 statements specifically addressing aspects of labor induction and the childbirth experience, with responses evaluated using a Likert scale. |
| Number of participants with third degree tear of perineum during labour | 1 week from induction | The investigators will observe the occurrence of third-degree perineal tears during labor. A third-degree tear involves injury to the anal sphincter complex, classified as follows: 3a involves less than 50% of the external anal sphincter (EAS) being torn, 3b involves more than 50% of the EAS being torn, and 3c involves tearing of both the EAS and the internal anal sphincter (IAS). |
Countries
Slovenia
Contacts
Primary ContactPOLONA PEČLIN
Outcome results
None listed