Skip to content

PMCF Study of the Axonics SNM System Model 5101 (R20) for the Indication of OAB

Post-Market Clinical Follow-up Study of the Rechargeable Axonics SNM System Model 5101 (R20) for the Indication of Overactive Bladder (OAB)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06789406
Enrollment
55
Registered
2025-01-23
Start date
2025-09-18
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overactive Bladder (OAB), Urinary Frequency (UF), Urinary Urge Incontinence (UUI)

Brief summary

Post-market clinical follow-up for continued assessment of safety and performance to confirm long-term outcomes of the Axonics SNM System INS Model 5101.

Detailed description

This post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) is conducted to assess the continued safety, device performance, and clinical benefit of the rechargeable Axonics SNM System INS Model 5101 also referred to as R20.

Interventions

Participants treated with the rechargeable Axonics SNM System Model 5101 also referred to as R20. Commercial devices used in this study are within their intended use as described in each geography's approved instructions for use.

Sponsors

Axonics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 years or older 2. Primary indication of OAB (urinary urgency incontinence (UUI) / urinary frequency (UF) who are not candidates for, or who have failed conservative treatment 3. Willing and capable to provide written consent and agrees to comply with specified evaluations at clinical centers for all follow-up assessments

Exclusion criteria

1. Any significant medical condition that is likely to interfere with procedures, device operation, or likely to confound evaluation of endpoints (i.e., neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis) 2. Any psychiatric or personality disorder that is likely to interfere with procedures at the discretion of the participating physician; this may include poor understanding or compliance with requirements 3. Previously underwent an external sacral neuromodulation SNM trial and was deemed a non-responder or was previously implanted with a sacral neuromodulation device and did not get therapeutic benefit (a non-responder) 4. History of allergic response to titanium, zirconia, polyurethane, epoxy, or silicone 5. A female who is breastfeeding 6. A female with a positive urine pregnancy test

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Performance/Effectiveness - Improvement in Qualify of Life scoring (OAB)3 monthsTo demonstrate an improvement in Overactive Bladder Quality of Life using the International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder Qualify of Life (ICIQ-OABqol): questions in each subscale are scored by a summed range of 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Overall score ≥ 10 points from baseline to follow-up is indicative of a clinically meaningful improvement.
Adverse event reporting (Safety)3 monthsDevice related, procedure-related and all serious adverse events

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Performance/Effectiveness - Improvement in Qualify of Life scoring (OAB)12 monthsTo demonstrate an improvement in Overactive Bladder Quality of Life using the International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder Qualify of Life (ICIQ-OABqol): questions in each subscale are scored by a summed range of 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Overall score ≥ 10 points from baseline to follow-up is indicative of a clinically meaningful improvement.
Performance/Effectiveness - Improvement in Qualify of Life scoring (FI)12 monthsCleveland Clinic Florida - Fecal Incontinence Score (CCF-FIS): scores range from 0 for full continence to 20 for complete incontinence. A higher score is indicative of the severity of fecal incontinence. Assessed if participant had a score of ≥6 at baseline.

Countries

United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

CONTACTCaroline Beaudoint
Caroline.Beaudoint@bsci.com+32479904163
CONTACTErum Shaikh
Erum.Shaikh@bsci.com657-626-4310
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMahreen Pakzad, MD

University College London Hospitals

STUDY_DIRECTORGita Ghadimi, OD

Boston Scientific Corporation

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026