Skip to content

Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.

Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Hard Hybrid Ceramic Overlays on Endodontically Treated Molars Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: Two-Year Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06787469
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-01-22
Start date
2025-06-23
Completion date
2027-01-01
Last updated
2025-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endodontically Treated Molar

Keywords

Resin Cement, SHOFU, Bioactive Resin Cement, SPRG, S-PRG, Endodontically treated teeth, BeautiLink SA

Brief summary

Cementation of indirect restoration is a determinant of the success or failure of the fabricated restoration and consequentially the entire tooth. While there are numerous commercially available resin cements in the dental market, not all have been sufficiently assessed with significant follow up periods to clinically determine their success or failure. As such, this research will be conducted to elucidate if there is a viability to the cementation of indirect hybrid ceramic blocks over endodontically treated teeth using bioactive self-adhesive resin cement and determining whether it provides a clinical advantage and improved restoration serviceability in the oral cavity.

Interventions

Bioactive self adhesive resin cement (SHOFU BeautiLink) used to cement indirect restorations to endodontically treated molars.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This study will be conducted on the form of a randomized controlled, unicenter, clustered two-arm superiority trial with a 1:1 allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient Related Criteria: * Adult patients (age: 21-50 years) of both genders. * Able to tolerate necessary restorative procedures. * Willing to sign the informed consent. * Accepts the follow-up period. Tooth Related Criteria: * Endodontically treated first and second permanent molars. * Access cavities with one missing proximal wall i.e. Occluso-mesial/distal cavities * Patients with proper oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

* Endodontically treated anterior, premolar and third molar teeth * Badly broken-down teeth * Hopelessly carious/destructed teeth necessitating extraction * Mobile teeth, indicating periodontal disease or trauma. * External or internal resorption. * Cervical carious lesions * Medically compromised patients * Patients with known allergies to Latex and/or resinous material

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Modified USPHS Criteria2 years

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed N Shalaby, Masters Restorative Dentistry
ahmad.shalaby@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+201014850792

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026