Skip to content

Standard Care With or Without Early Palliative Care Provided by Palliative Care Specialist in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Randomized Controlled Trial of Standard Care With or Without Early Palliative Care Provided by Palliative Care Specialist in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06786468
Enrollment
104
Registered
2025-01-22
Start date
2024-04-02
Completion date
2027-04-30
Last updated
2025-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer - Non Small Cell, Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Keywords

early palliative care, palliative care, lung cancer

Brief summary

Early palliative care has been shown to improve the survival of advanced lung cancer patients. However, most of the clinical studies were performed in the era when systemic treatment options for this disease were limited. Currently, many effective treatment options are available, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy. These novel agents improve the treatment outcomes while having less toxicity compared to conventional chemotherapy. Moreover, medical oncologists are now trained to provide palliative care for patients. This study was designed to demonstrate whether early palliative care provided by the palliative care specialist still improves the quality of life or survival of advanced lung cancer patients compared to standard care provided by the medical oncologist.

Detailed description

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients initiating a systemic treatment will be randomized to the early palliative care arm (attending a palliative care clinic once a month during the first three months concurrently with oncology clinic appointment) or the standard care arm (attending oncology clinic only). The patients will be asked to complete the quality of life questionnaires (FACT-L, EQ-5D-5L), mental health questionnaire (PHQ-9), and pain assessment once a month for three months and at the sixth month.

Interventions

The patients will attend palliative care clinic once a month during the first three months together with routine oncology clinic visits

DRUGStandard systemic treatment for advanced lung cancer

Standard systemic treatment for advanced lung cancer

Sponsors

Mahidol University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age at least 18 years old * Pathologically confirmed advanced non-small cell lung cancer * Plan to receive systemic treatment for lung cancer within three weeks * ECOG performance status 0-2 with estimated life expectancy \> 24 weeks * Having at least 4 scores according to Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) * Able to complete the questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

* Had received systemic treatment for advanced lung cancer before

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life score (FACT-L Total Score)12 weeks after treatmentThe patients were asked to assess their Health-related Quality Of Life (HRQoL) using FACT-L (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung) questionnaire. The score ranges from 0-136 with higher score indicating better HRQoL.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in mental health score (PHQ-9)12 and 24 weeks after treatmentThe patients were asked to assess their depression levels using a Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). The score ranges from 0-27 with 0 indicating no depression and 27 indicating severe depression.
Change in pain score12 and 24 weeks after treatmentThe patients were asked to assess their pain using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The score ranges from 0-10 with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worst pain imaginable.
One-year survival rateOne year after treatment
Change in quality of life (FACT-L Total Scores)12 and 24 weeks after treatmentThe patients were asked to assess their Health-related Quality Of Life (HRQoL) using FACT-L (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung) questionnaire. The score ranges from 0-136 with higher score indicating better HRQoL. Change in FACT-L Total Scores defined as the difference between FACT-L Total Score at a specified time point minus baseline FACT-L Total Score.
Proportion of patients who have advanced care plansix months
Change in utility score measured by EQ-5D-5L questionnaire12 and 24 weeks after treatment
Two-year survival rateTwo years after treatment

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Primary ContactLucksamon Thamlikitkul, MD, PhD
lucksamon.tha@mahidol.edu+6624194489

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026