Skip to content

Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the '6 Minute Pegboard and Ring Test' Unsupported Arm Function Exercise Test in Patients Using Pacemakers

Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the '6 Minute Pegboard and Ring Test' Unsupported Arm Function Exercise Test in Patients Using Pacemakers

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06783023
Enrollment
27
Registered
2025-01-20
Start date
2024-05-01
Completion date
2025-03-01
Last updated
2026-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices, Upper Extremity Function

Brief summary

Recently, the use of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED) is becoming widespread due to the improvement of patients' symptoms, reduction of sudden cardiac death and improved quality of life. Although implantation of the device is considered a minor invasive procedure, possible but often underestimated dysfunction of the same side upper extremity may develop after implantation. This increase in the number of device implantations makes shoulder dysfunction after pacemaker implantation a major health problem. In the current research in the literature, arm dysfunction is evaluated by measuring range of motion with a dynamic goniometer, scales scored independently of shoulder pathology and the effect of activities of daily living. This indicates that there is no objective functional assessment method used to evaluate arm function in CIED patients. Therefore, the point of this study is to find out how reliable and valid the 6 Minute Pegboard and Ring Test (6PBRT) is for testing the functional capacity of the upper extremity in people who have had CIED implanted.

Interventions

In the study, which will include at least 24 individuals with CIED determined by power analysis, unassisted arm exercise capacity and arm function/endurance, maximum arm exercise capacity, double product, heart recovery, comorbidity level, hand grip strength, fear of movement, activities of daily living and quality of life will be evaluated.

Sponsors

Erol Olcok Corum Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Hacettepe University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between the ages of 18-65 who have a pacemaker, * At least 3 months have passed since pacemaker implantation and there are no complications in the last pacemaker control, * Being in NYHA class I-II-III, * Patients with no coordination problems, * Patients who volunteered to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a history of shoulder pathologies prior to pacemaker implantation that may restrict movement of the upper limb (conditions such as severe pain around the shoulder, edema or shoulder dislocation that may restrict upper limb movement), * Patients with a history of shoulder surgery (limitation in range of motion), * Patients who have had a cerebrovascular event resulting in mastectomy or arm involvement on the affected side, * Patients with decompensated heart failure, * Patients with a history of ICD inappropriate shock, * Those with acute myocardial infarction, * Patients with malignancy on active treatment, collagen tissue disease receiving systemic steroids, * Chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis with unstable volume load.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of unsupported arm exercise capacity1 year6 Minute Pegboard and Ring Test-6PBRT
Evaluation of maximal arm exercise capacity1 yearArm Ergometer Test / It is a gold standard method used to evaluate upper extremity exercise capacity. At the beginning and end of the test, heart rate, saturation and BORG scale will be evaluated for fatigue and dyspnea. In women, it will start with 20 watts and increase by 6 watts every 1 minute, while in men, it will start with 30 watts and increase by 10 watts every 1 minute. The rotation speed will be maintained at 70 rpm. The test will be terminated if the perceived exertion level is ≥ 18 and/or the rotation speed cannot be maintained above 60 rpm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of hand grip strength1 yearJAMAR Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer
Evaluation of Activities of Daily Living1 yearPerformance Measure for Activities of Daily Living-8 for Patient with Mild Symptomatic Heart Failure- PMADL-8. The total score ranges from 8-32, with a high score indicating a level of limitation in activities of daily living.
Evaluation of Quality of Life1 yearMacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire / The questions are scored from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Evaluation of Kinesiophobia1 yearTampa Scale of Kinesiophobia for Heart- TSK- HEART / The person receives a total score between 17 and 68. A high score on the scale indicates a high level of kinesiophobia.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 18, 2026