Skip to content

Ulnar Shaft Fracture Fixation by Antegrade Versus Retrograde Intramedullary k Wires in Children

Ulnar Shaft Fracture Fixation by Antegrade Versus Retrograde Intramedullary k Wires in Children;A Comparative Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06781684
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-01-17
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2025-07-01
Last updated
2025-01-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fracture of Ulna Shaft

Keywords

Fixation of pediatric ulna shaft fracture

Brief summary

This study is made to see and evaluate the outcomes of treating and fixing ulnar shaft fracture in children by antegrade versus retrograde intramedullary k wires

Detailed description

This study is made on children with ulnar shaft fracture and treating their fracture by intramedullary k wires ,dividing them into two groups ,one of them the child ulnar fracture is reduced and fixed by intramedullary antegrade k wire and the other group the fracture is reduced and fixed by retrograde k wire ,and compare the functional, clinical and radiological outcomes between the two groups

Interventions

PROCEDUREulna shaft fracture fixation in children by intramedullary k wire

* In the 1st group The Antegrade intramedullary k wire with appropriate diameter according to the child ulna diameter is introduced from the olecranon of the fractured ulna,cross the fracture site after good reduction under C arm in the anterioposterior and lateral views and the wire continues until reaching before the distal ulna . * In the 2nd group The Retrograde intramedullary k wire with appropriate diameter is introduced from the diatal end of the ulna and cross the fracture site after good reduction under C arm and continues until reaching before the olecranon.

Sponsors

Sohag University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pediatric patient * aging from 4 to 15 years old * diaphyseal ulnar fracture * either isolated or combined with radius fracture (both bone).

Exclusion criteria

* Segmental fractures * Montaggia variants * Gelliazzi fracture * Fractures associated with radial head fracture - Compound fractures * Fractures with neurovascular affection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The duration of complete union of the bone in every groupThe evaluation is done at 2,4,6 and 12 weeks and 3 monthsEach patient is evaluated radiologically after fixing the fracture by x-ray AP and lateral views after 2 week ,4 ,6 ,12 weeks and 3 months to see the time each one taking to complete union . -Also clinical and functional evaluation of every patient and timing of ability to use his forearm , ability to do supination and pronation of the forearm , flexion and extension of the elbow and wrist , ability to do ulnar deviation at the level of the wrist and degree of pain and apprehension with each movement ,Degree of pain and tenderness in the fracture site and time taking to complete disappearing of pain and tenderness ,degree of stiffness and need to physiotherapy ,these data is collected from each patient at the time of follow up in the outpatient clinic and recorded for everyone in each group.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026