Skip to content

A Study to Investigate Effects of Ocrelizumab Treatment on Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) Levels and Participant Satisfaction in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

SurfSubQ - A Prospective Longitudinal Multicenter Observational Study to Investigate Neurofilament Light Chain Levels and Patient Satisfaction After Subcutaneous Ocrelizumab Administration in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06780150
Acronym
SurfSubQ
Enrollment
842
Registered
2025-01-17
Start date
2024-09-26
Completion date
2028-03-31
Last updated
2026-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

The main purpose of the study is to evaluate participant satisfaction after administration of ocrelizumab subcutaneously (SC) after 12 months using the therapy administration satisfaction questionnaire subcutaneous (TASQ-SC).

Interventions

DRUGOcrelizumab

Ocrelizumab will be administered as SC injection as per discretion of the treating physician in accordance with local clinical practice and local labeling.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of MS * RMS and PPMS participants diagnosed according to the McDonald criteria of 2017 or revised McDonald criteria 2024 * First treatment during the course of MS therapy with ocrelizumab SC according to the local prescribing information, regardless of the reason for starting treatment with ocrelizumab

Exclusion criteria

* Participation in interventional studies investigating DMTs for MS * Prior or simultaneous participation in CONFIDENCE or MoOzaRt (ISRCTN55332718) non interventional study (NIS) at the same study site * Prior treatment with rituximab (MabThera®) or ublituximab (Briumvi®) * Severe psychiatric disability * Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants by Their Level of Satisfaction With Ocrelizumab SC After 12 Months Assessed Using TASQ-SCMonth 12TASQ-SC is a 12-item, participant-reported questionnaire measuring the impact of treatment administration on five domains: Physical Impact, Psychological Impact, Impact on Activities of Daily Living, Convenience, and Satisfaction. Each of the domain/scale scores is scored on a scale of 1-100, where higher scores indicate higher overall satisfaction with the therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Participant Satisfaction With Ocrelizumab SC Assessed Using Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) 1.4Baseline, Month 6, Month 12TSQM version 1.4 is a 14-item questionnaire used to measure level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the medication on 4 domains: Effectiveness, Side Effects, Convenience, and Global Satisfaction. Each of the domain is scored on likert-type scales of 5 or 7 points ranging from 1 (least satisfied) to 5 or 7 (most satisfied). Item scores are summarized to give four domain scores, which are in turn transformed to a scale of 0-100. Higher scores indicate higher overall satisfaction with the therapy.
Number of Participants by Their Level of Satisfaction With Ocrelizumab SC Assessed by Physician SurveyBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
Annualized Relapse RateMonth 12
Percentage of Participants With Progression Independent of Relapse Activity (PIRA)Up to Month 12
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (nsAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interests (AESIs)Up to Month 12
Number of Participants by Their Level of Satisfaction With Ocrelizumab SC After the First Injection and After 6 Months Assessed Using TASQ-SCBaseline, Month 6TASQ-SC is a 12-item, participant-reported questionnaire measuring the impact of treatment administration on five domains: Physical Impact, Psychological Impact, Impact on Activities of Daily Living, Convenience, and Satisfaction. Each of the domain/scale scores is scored on a scale of 1-100, where higher scores indicate higher overall satisfaction with the therapy.
Change From Baseline in NfL Protein Levels in SerumBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
Concentration of NfL Protein Levels in SerumBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
Correlation Between NfL Protein Levels in Serum With MS RelapseUp to Month 12The changes in levels of NfL protein levels in serum and its correlation with MS relapse will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients.
Correlation Between NfL Protein Levels in Serum With Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Up to Month 12The changes in levels of NfL protein levels in serum and its correlation with EDSS will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients. EDSS is a scale for assessing neurologic impairment in MS. Values are from 0 points (normal neurological examination) up to 10 points (death), increasing in increments of 0.5 points. Higher scores represent increased disability.
Correlation Between NfL Protein Levels in Serum With Previous MS Disease Modifying Therapy (DMT)Up to Month 12The changes in levels of NfL protein in serum and its correlation with DMT will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients.
Correlation Between NfL Protein Levels in Serum With NfL Confounder - Serum CreatinineUp to Month 12The changes in levels of NfL protein in serum and its correlation with serum creatinine will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients.
Correlation Between NfL Protein Levels in Serum With NfL Confounder - Co-morbiditiesUp to Month 12The changes in levels of NfL protein in serum and its correlation with co-morbidities will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients.
Correlation Between NfL Protein Levels in Serum With NfL Confounder - AgeUp to Month 12The changes in levels of NfL protein in serum and its correlation with age will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients.
Correlation Between NfL Protein Levels in Serum With NfL Confounder - Body Mass Index [BMI]Up to Month 12The changes in levels of NfL protein in serum and its correlation with BMI will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients.
Correlation Between NfL Protein Levels in Serum With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Lesion CountUp to Month 12The changes in levels of NfL protein in serum and its correlation with MRI lesion count will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients.
Correlation Between NfL Protein Levels in Serum With No Evidence of Disease Activity-3 (NEDA-3)Up to Month 12NEDA-3 is defined by no confirmed MS relapse, no new or enlarging T2 lesions, no Gadolinium-positive T1 lesions, and no six-month confirmed disability worsening. The changes in levels of NfL protein in serum and its correlation with NEDA-3 will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients.
Correlation Between NfL Protein Levels in Serum With Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) LevelsUp to Month 12The changes in levels of NfL protein in serum and its correlation with GFAP levels will be analyzed using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients.

Countries

Germany, Switzerland

Contacts

CONTACTReference Study ID Number: ML45551 https://forpatients.roche.com/ No attachments to email below
global-roche-genentech-trials@gene.com888-662-6728 (U.S. Only)
CONTACTFastest response: use the inquiry form https://www.gene.com/contact-us/submit-medical-inquiry
STUDY_DIRECTORClinical Trials

Hoffmann-La Roche

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 16, 2026