Skip to content

Phase III Clinical Study of MG-K10 Humanized Mab Injection in Subjects With Prurigo Nodularis

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of a Humanized MG-K10 Mab Injection in Subjects With Prurigo Nodularis.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06779136
Enrollment
160
Registered
2025-01-16
Start date
2025-02-26
Completion date
2026-11-30
Last updated
2025-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prurigo Nodularis

Keywords

Prurigo nodularis

Brief summary

A phase III clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a humanized MG-K10 mab injection in subjects with prurigo nodularis.administered every 4 weeks for 56 weeks.

Detailed description

The study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III study. Approximately 160 adults with prurigo nodularis were scheduled to receive multiple subcutaneous injections (every 4 weeks for 56 weeks). The study was divided into a screening period (1-4 weeks), a double-blind treatment period (24 weeks), a maintenance treatment period (24 weeks), and a follow-up period (8 weeks).

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Every four weeks, subcutaneous injection,Switch to MG-K10 treatment after 24 weeks of administration

Sponsors

Shanghai Mabgeek Biotech.Co.Ltd
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

A phase III clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a humanized MG-K10 mab injection in subjects with prurigo nodularis.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

eligibility criteria: 1. voluntarily sign the ICF and comply with all the visits and research-related procedures required by the protocol; 2. Both men and women were required to be ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old at the time of signing the informed consent; 3. the duration of PN diagnosed by a dermatologist at the time of screening was ≥ 3 months; 4. In the range of 1-10, WI-NRS≥7 in the past 24 h at screening; WI-NRS in the week before the baseline visit The average weekly score was ≥ 7 points.

Exclusion criteria

: 1. There are skin diseases other than PN and mild atopic dermatitis (AD) that may interfere with the assessment of research outcomes. 2. Patients who had a history of moderate to severe AD during the 6 months prior to the screening visit or screening visit. 3. Receiving potent or super-potent TCS/TCI treatment within 2 weeks before or during screening. 4\) Evidence of active tuberculosis. 5) Participation in any other clinical study within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives prior to screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportions of subjects achieving WI-NRSweek 24In the experimental group, the weekly mean value of WI-NRS at week 24 was compared with baseline.Proportion of subjects who improved (decreased) by ≥ 4 points

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportions of subjects achieving IGA PN-S score of 0/1 pointweek 24Proportion of subjects with overall disease score of 0/1
The proportion of subjects whose weekly mean WI-NRS decreased by ≥ 4 from baseline at each evaluation visitFrom baseline to week 56The proportion of subjects whose weekly mean WI-NRS decreased by ≥ 4 from baseline at each evaluation visit
The absolute value and percentage change of weekly mean WI-NRS from baseline at each evaluation visit;From baseline to week 56The absolute value and percentage change of weekly mean WI-NRS from baseline at each evaluation visit;
Duration of onset of response to pruritusFrom baseline to week 56The proportion of subjects with a weekly mean decrease of ≥4 points from baseline in the WI-NRS was compared, and the difference from the placebo group was first presented p \< 0.05).
the first response to pruritus occurred.from baseline to the week 24The time from baseline to the 24th week when the first response to pruritus occurred (the average weekly WI-NRS score decreased by ≥ 4 points compared with the baseline)
Proportion of subjects with an IGA PN-S score of 0/1From baseline to week 56Proportion of subjects with IGA PN-S score of 0/1 at each evaluation visit
The time when the first intergroup response difference in pruritus occurredFrom baseline to week 24The time of the first intergroup response difference for pruritus (the time when the difference in the proportion of subjects with a weekly average WI-NRS score reduction of ≥ 4 points compared to the baseline first reached p \< 0.05 compared with the placebo group)
The duration of the difference in persistent response to pruritus between groupsFrom baseline to week 24The duration of the difference in persistent response between the prurity-onset groups (comparing the change in weekly WI-NRS from baseline between the MG-K10 and placebo groups, the time when the difference between the MG-K10 and placebo groups first appeared to be p \< 0.05 and remained significant on subsequent measures)
Changes in IGA PN-S scoresFrom baseline to week 56Changes in IGA PN-S scores from baseline at each evaluation site
Changes in IGA PN-A scores from baselineFrom baseline to week 56Changes in IGA PN-A scores from baseline at each evaluation visit
Proportion of subjects wit weekly WI-NRS improvement (decrease) of ≥ 4 points and IGA PN-S of 0/1From baseline to week 56Proportion of subjects with weekly WI-NRS improvement (decrease) of ≥ 4 points from baseline and IGA PN-S of 0/1 at each evaluation visit
Changes in DLQI scores from baselineFrom baseline to week 56Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) from baseline at each evaluation visit
Changes in HADS from baselineFrom baseline to week 56Changes in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS) from baseline at each evaluation site
safetyFrom baseline to week 56These include Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Serious Adverse events Events (SAE), adverse events of special interest (AESI), clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examination, and abnormalities in 12-lead electrocardiograms;
pharmacokineticsFrom baseline to week 56Ctrough (valley concentration) change over time;
pharmacodynamicsFrom baseline to week 56Changes of biomarkers before and after administration
immunogenicityFrom baseline to week 56Occurrence of Anit-Drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb)
Proportion of subjects with an IGA PN-A score of 0/1From baseline to week 56Proportion of subjects with an IGA PN-A score of 0/1 from baseline to each visit point

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contactxiaofeng xiao Cai, bachelor
xiaofeng.cai@mabgeek.com02151371305

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026