Skip to content

MR Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B

Retrospective and Prospective Multi-center Clinical Study of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Evaluating Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Viral Hepatitis B

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06779058
Enrollment
600
Registered
2025-01-16
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis B, Liver Fibrosis

Keywords

Magnetic resonance elastography, Liver stiffness, Antiviral therapy

Brief summary

How to construct a non-invasive, accurate, and convenient method to evaluate the severity of liver fibrosis (LF) is an important general problem in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We plan to investigate the ability of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to grade fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B and apply to clinical longitudinal follow-up.

Detailed description

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the most prevalent chronic viral infection worldwide, affecting 254 million people and resulting in 1.2 million new infections annually . Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is strongly associated with liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and death. Patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) can achieve an overall cure rate of more than 95% after 12 weeks of treatment with direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA). However, patients with chronic hepatitis B still need long-term management due to the complexity and persistence of their disease. Therefore, rapid, stable and accurate assessment of the disease status of hepatitis B patients and clear classification of liver fibrosis are of great significance for clinical management of chronic hepatitis B patients. Meanwhile, Antiviral therapy can significantly slow liver disease progression and improve long-term survival in CHB patients. Treatment is only recommended for CHB adults when histological evidences ≥ F2; evidence of F4 based on clinical criteria; HBV DNA \> 2000 IU/mL with ALT \> ULN (Men: 30 U/L, Women: 19 U/L); or persistent ALT abnormality. For treated patients, imaging and clinical indicators are monitored every six months during the first year, then annually. For untreated patients, monitoring is conducted on an annual basis . However, these current tests often fail to reflect pathological changes in real-time, as they tend to lag behind actual disease progression. Therefore, finding an effective method for regular follow-up is also essential for both treated and untreated patients. The current diagnostic gold standard, liver biopsy, has limitations due to its invasive nature, sampling error, complications, and high cost, making it impractical for evaluating liver fibrosis and longitudinal monitoring in CHB patients. There is an urgent need for noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis and antiviral treatment efficacy. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has shown promise in assessing liver fibrosis and necroinflammation in CHB patients. At present, there are few studies on CHB, all of which are single-center studies. The reported cut-off point is not uniform, which is generally lower than the international standard, and whether 2D/3D MRE affects the threshold are inconsistent. Therefore, a multi-center clinical study on the evaluation of CHB fibrosis based on MRE and its application in clinical longitudinal follow-up need to be carried out.

Interventions

DEVICEMRE

All imaging studies were performed by using a 1.5T/3.0-T MRI system

DEVICELiver biopsy

Liver biopsy are performed by well-trained pathologists in accordance with standard operating procedures.

Sponsors

Shengjing Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years old * Confirmed CHB (laboratory, imaging and clinical tests) * MRE within 6 months before and after liver biopsy * Treatment-naïve * Child-Pugh Grade A (\<7 points) * Written informed consent in prospective follow-up cohort

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with liver malignant tumor * Chronic hepatitis due to other causes (such as alcoholic hepatitis) * CHB combined with hepatitis C, hepatitis D, or HIV * Patients with biliary tract diseases * Contraindications of MRE examination, MRE failure * Poor pathological effect

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of the features of MRE for grading fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B.6 monthsWIth liver biopsy as reference standand, the diagnostic perforemace (accuracy) for fibrosis of MRE was assessed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The efficacy of grading liver fibrosis in CHB patients evaluated by MRE superior to TE and serological indicators (APRI, FIB-4).6 monthsWIth liver biopsy as reference standand, the efficacy of MRE, TE and serological indicators (APRI, FIB-4) in evaluating the classification of liver fibrosis were compared.
The excellent ability of MRE as a non-invasive biomarker for longitudinal monitoring in CHB patients.12 monthsWIth QIBA Profile: Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver as reference standand, changes in MRE and liver histology or clinical indicators during follow-up were investigated.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTYiyang Wang
15291014907@163.com+86 15291014907
CONTACTYu Shi
18940259980@163.com+86 189 4025 9980
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORYu Shi

Shengjing Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026