Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
Conditions
Keywords
artificial intelligence, health literacy, decisional conflict
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the use of a generative artificial intelligence large language model chatbot in improving decision making factors in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the use of an artificial intelligence chatbot have an effect on decisional conflict and anxiety related to decision making? Are changes in decisional conflict correlated with changes in patient reported outcomes? Are changes in decisional conflict correlated with health literacy? Participants will interact with an artificial intelligence chatbot prior to their clinic visit with an orthopaedic surgeon, using a structured prompt.
Interventions
OTHERArtificial Intelligence Chatbot
The intervention is a generative artificial intelligence large language model chatbot that has a structured prompt with fill-in-the-blank style questions that the participant will complete.
Sponsors
University of California, Davis
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Adult * Ability to read and write in English * All races and ethnicities * Clinical symptoms of hip and/or knee osteoarthritis
Exclusion criteria
* Inability to read and write in English
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Decisional Conflict Scale | At three time points: Within one week after the clinic visit, 1 month after the clinic visit, 6 months after the clinic visit. | 16 questions with Likert scale style answers ranging from 0 to 4. The raw score is converted to a score out of 100. The score ranges from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict). |
| Beck Anxiety Inventory | At three time points: Within one week after the clinic visit, 1 month after the clinic visit, 6 months after the clinic visit. | 21 questions with Likert scale style answers ranging from 0 to 4. The raw score is the sum of the answers, which is converted to a score out of 100. The score ranges from 0 (low anxiety) to 63 (high anxiety). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement | At enrollment | 7 questions with Likert scale style answers ranging from 0 to 4. The raw score is the sum of the answers, which is converted to a score out of 100. The score ranges from 0 (total knee disability) to 100 (perfect knee health). |
| Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement | At enrollment | 6 questions with Likert scale style answers ranging from 0 to 4. The raw score is the sum of the answers, which is converted to a score out of 100. The score ranges from 0 (total hip disability) to 100 (perfect hip health). |
| Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Version 1.2 | At enrollment | 10 questions with Likert scale style answers ranging from 1 to 5 and 1 question about pain with answers from 0 to 10. The questions are grouped into 4 sub-groups corresponding to physical and mental health main groups, in addition to the pain score. The raw scores are a sum of the answers for both physical and mental health range from 4 (poor physical or mental health) to 20 (best possible physical or mental health). The raw score is then converted to a t-score using the associated tables with the range 16.2 (worst possible physical or mental health) to 67.7 (best possible physical or mental health). The t-score is interpreted in comparison to the general population that has a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORZachary C Lum, DO
University of California, Davis
Outcome results
None listed