Erector Spinae Plane Block, Lower Extremity Surgery, Sciatic Nerve Block
Conditions
Keywords
sacral erector spinae plane block, lower extremity surgery, lumbar erector spinae plane block, sciatic nerve block
Brief summary
In this study, patients who underwent osteosynthesis with plate via standard anterolateral incision due to proximal tibia fracture in the orthopedic clinic within the last year; those who underwent perioperative anesthesia with spinal block, those who underwent postoperative analgesia with Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block, lumbar-sacral Erector Spine plane block combinations in the recovery unit will be identified and their files will be scanned retrospectively. Gender, surgical duration, postoperative block, pre-post block pain levels will be reviewed via Visual Analog Scale scoring, postoperative analgesics consumed and their amounts, Bromage scale, mobilization times, block-related complications, satisfaction levels will be determined and these two groups of patients who underwent block will be compared in terms of analgesia, complications, and satisfaction.
Interventions
This study is to retrospectively compare the analgesic efficacy and impact on postoperative recovery of popliteal sciatic nerve blocks and Lumbar-Sacral Erector Spinae Plane blocks administered for postoperative pain management in tibial fractures.
This study is to retrospectively compare the analgesic efficacy and impact on postoperative recovery of popliteal sciatic nerve blocks and Lumbar-Sacral Erector Spinae Plane blocks administered for postoperative pain management in tibial fractures.
Sponsors
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients aged 18-65 * Patients undergoing spinal anesthesia * Patients undergoing postoperative erector spinae plane block * Patients undergoing postoperative sciatic nerve block
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant patients * Patients who cannot be contacted * Patients who have undergone perioperative general anesthesia * Patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease * Patients with data loss * Patients who did not receive consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Analgesia | 24 hours | Postoperative analgesia will be assessed by Visual Analog Scale Score and postoperative analgesic consumption. The visual analog scale is a numerical assessment ranging from 0 to 10. A score of 0 is considered as no pain, a score of 5 is considered as moderate pain, and a score of 10 is considered as unbearable pain. Rescue intravenous analgesic treatment is applied to scores of 4 and above. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Block related complication | 24 hours | Patients will be evaluated with Bromage Scale and mobilization times.The bromage scale is a numerical assessment ranging from 0 to 3. A score of 0 is No motor block, a score of 1 is Inability to raise extended leg; able to move knees and feet no pain, a score of 2 is Inability to raise extended leg and move knee; able to move feet, a score of 3 is Complete block of motor limb.It will also be checked when the patients can walk after the motor block has passed. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed