Exercise Addiction, Shoulder Pain, Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
Shoulder pain, Shoulder function, Shoulder exercise, Kinesio taping, Thoracic exercise, Thoracic posture
Brief summary
Participants with subacromial pain syndrome underwent shoulder exercises. In addition to the exercises, group A received thoracic extension exercise and group B received kinesio taping. All exercises were performed five days per week for three weeks. Thoracic extension exercise was performed once a week and remained in place for 5 days. Evaluations were performed one to three days before and one to three days after the three-week exercise program.
Detailed description
Seventy-five adults with subacromial pain syndrome were randomized into three groups. Group A and Group B received thoracal extension exersice and thoracal kinesiotaping in addition to shoulder exercise, respectively, while Group C received only shoulder exercise. All exercises were performed five days a week for three weeks. Thoracal extension exercise was applied once a week and remained in place for 5 days. Assessments were conducted one to three days before and one to three days after the three-week exercise program. Shoulder pain intensity, pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the upper trapezius and pectoralis major, self-reported function and health status, active range of motion (AROM), and isometric strength of the shoulder were assessed.
Interventions
OTHERShoulder exercises + Thoracic extension exercise
Shoulder exercises and thoracic extension exercises were performed 5 days a week for 3 weeks.
OTHERShoulder exercises + Thoracic kinesio taping
In addition to shoulder exercises, thoracic kinesio taping was applied. Shoulder exercises were performed 5 days a week for 3 weeks. TKT was applied once a week and remained in place for 5 days.
OTHERShoulder exercises
Shoulder exercises were performed. They were performed 5 days a week for 3 weeks.
Sponsors
Sevtap Günay
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The evaluator did not know the group to which the participants were assigned.
Intervention model description
This research was planned as a randomized controlled trial.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Having shoulder pain for at least 6 weeks * Aggravation of shoulder pain with resisted shoulder movements
Exclusion criteria
* Those with full-thickness rotator cuff rupture * Those who have had previous shoulder surgery * Those who have had cervical or thoracic spine surgery * Those with a history of inflammatory disease or cancer
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Shoulder function assessment | At the beginning and after 3 weeks | Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire was used to assess the condition. It is a questionnaire used to evaluate upper extremity function status. The questionnaire consists of three sections, and the person marks the appropriate answer for each question on the Likert system with a score of 5 (1: no difficulty, 2: mild difficulty, 3: moderate difficulty, 4: extreme difficulty, 5: completely unable to do). According to the DASH questionnaire result; a result between 0-100 is obtained from each section. |
| Muscle strength assessment | At the beginning and after 3 weeks | Muscle strength will be measured with a digital hand dynamometer. Muscle strength measurements of the subjects' flexion, extension abduction, adduction, external and internal rotation movements will be made. The measurements made with the dynamometer will be based on the fine muscle test positions and method defined by Lovett. The tests will be repeated three times and at least one minute of rest will be given between repetitions. The highest of the 3 repetitions was accepted as the result. |
| Thoracic kyphosis assessment | At the beginning and after 3 weeks | For thoracic kyphosis measurement, inclinometers were placed at T1-T2 and T12-L1 to perform the evaluation. |
| Pain intensity assessment | At the beginning and after 3 weeks | It was evaluated using a visual analog scale. The scale is between 0 and 10 points, and increasing numbers indicate increased pain intensity. |
| Pressure pain threshold assessment | At the beginning and after 3 weeks | Pressure pain threshold measurement was measured with an algometer device. Algometers are a device that can be used to define pressure and pressure pain threshold. Upper trapezius and pectoralis major muscles were evaluated. |
| Quality of life assessment | At the beginning and after 3 weeks | Health-related quality of life (SF-36) was assessed with the questionnaire. It consists of 36 items in total and has eight sub-parameters. These eight sub-parameters consist of physical function, pain, social function, physical role limitations, mental health, emotional role limitations, vitality, and general health parameters. The sub-scales are scored between 0-100 and an increase of 26 points indicates an increase in the quality of life. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed