Skip to content

Hypothermia Versus Normothermia After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Hypothermia Versus Normothermia After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Cluster Randomized Trial (SAVE-J NEUROTHERM Trial)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06776549
Acronym
J-NEURO
Enrollment
468
Registered
2025-01-15
Start date
2025-01-06
Completion date
2030-01-31
Last updated
2026-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ECMO Treatment, Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA), Post Cardiac Arrest Syndrome, Temperature

Keywords

Cardiac arrest, Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), Temperature control, Post cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS)

Brief summary

The SAVE-J NEUROTHERM trial is a cluster randomized trial that evaluated and compared the mortality risk, neurological outcomes, and adverse events between patients who underwent hypothermia and those who underwent normothermia after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Detailed description

Temperature control is a key neurointensive care for post-cardiac arrest patients. Although therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to be effective in the past, recent large randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate its efficacy. The international guidelines recommend temperature control under 37.7°C. However, the optimal temperature control, i.e., hypothermia versus normothermia, remains controversial. Additionally, randomized controlled trials that examined temperature control after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) are lacking. ECPR is a resuscitation technique using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for refractory cardiac arrest. In ECPR patients, ECMO using a heat exchanger can more rapidly achieve the targeted temperature as compared to other temperature control devices. Early cooling to achieve hypothermia after resuscitation is expected to be more effective for neuroprotection in the injured brain. Thus, the investigators hypothesized that hypothermia would be effective in ECPR patients. Furthermore, ECMO can stabilize the respiratory and circulatory status. Therefore, hypothermia, which may have side effects such as electrolyte abnormalities and arrhythmias, may be safely performed by ECMO. However, ECMO requires the administration of anticoagulants; therefore, it has the risk of hemorrhagic complications. Among patients receiving ECPR, bleeding is a common complication due to its relatively difficult procedure, considering the fact that emergent cannulation is performed under resuscitation. Additionally, CPR-related complications can also result in bleeding. These complications may be enhanced by hypothermia. Therefore, hypothermia after ECPR could contribute to a favorable outcome, but it could also cause bleeding. The SAVE-J NEUROTHERM trial is a cluster randomized trial that evaluated and compared the mortality risk, neurological outcomes, and adverse events between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients who underwent hypothermia and normothermia after ECPR.

Interventions

Procedure: Temperature control at 33-34 °C In the hypothermia group, patients receiving ECPR will be immediately cooled to 33ºC-34ºC with ECMO using a heat exchanger. After reaching this targeted temperature, the maintenance phase will start, and the target temperature will be kept at 33ºC-34°C. The maintenance phase will end 24 h after reaching this targeted temperature. Subsequently, rewarming to 36ºC-37ºC will be conducted in 24 h. After the rewarming, the temperature will be kept in the range of 36ºC-37.5ºC for 24 h after rewarming or until the end of ECMO, and should not exceed 37.5ºC. Other interventions, such as sedation, administration of neuromuscular blocking agents, antipyretics, and catecholamines, as well as mechanical circulatory support, are optional and performed at the patient's discretion.

Sponsors

Kagawa University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* OHCA * Age of 18-75 years, known or estimated * An initial cardiac arrest rhythm of ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia or pulseless electrical activity

Exclusion criteria

* ECMO initiated after sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and patients with sustained ROSC before ECMO initiation * OHCA of presumed non-cardiac etiology * Time from emergency call or witnessed arrest to hospital arrival of \>60 min * Time from hospital arrival to ECMO initiation of \>60 min * Pre-hospital ECPR * Unavailability of the ECMO heat exchanger for temperature control * Glasgow Coma Scale score before temperature control of \>8 * Core body temperature upon hospital arrival of ≤32ºC * Surgical intervention before temperature control (e.g., surgical intervention for the primary disease or complications related to resuscitation/ECMO procedures) * Do Not Attempt Resuscitation) order confirmed prior to temperature control * Limitations in intensive care before temperature control * Known cerebral performance category (CPC) of 3-4 before cardiac arrest * Known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with home oxygen therapy * Known or suspected pregnancy * Concomitant illness, such as malignancy, shortens life expectancy (180-day survival unlikely) * Consent not obtained or withdrawn by the participant or surrogate * Other reasons, physician's decision not to enroll the patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
SurvivalAt discharge (approximately 25 days)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SurvivalAt 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year after admission
Neurological function: Cerebral performance categories (CPC)At discharge (approximately 25 days), 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year after admissionThe range of cerebral performance category (CPC) score is from 1 (normal/good cerebral function) to 5 (brain death or death). The higher the score, the worse the outcome. A favorable neurological outcome was defined as a CPC of 1-2, whereas an unfavorable outcome was defined as a CPC of 3-5
Adverse eventsDuring the intensive care unit stay, an average of 2 weeksAdverse events during intensive care unit stay (arrhythmia, bleeding, pneumonia, and bacteremia)

Countries

Japan

Contacts

CONTACTAkihiko Inoue
j-neuro@googlegroups.com81-87-981-2392
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAkihiko Inoue

Hyogo Emergency Medical Center

STUDY_CHAIRYasuhiro Kuroda

Kagawa University

STUDY_CHAIRToru Hifumi

Kyorin University School of Medicine

STUDY_DIRECTORTetsuya Sakamoto

Teikyo University

STUDY_DIRECTORNaoaki Ichihara

Osaka University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 8, 2026