Rosacea, Rosacea Subtype 1 (Erythematotelangiectatic)
Conditions
Keywords
rosacea
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Gabapentin works to treat flushing/erythema associated with rosacea. It will also learn about the safety of drug Gabapentin. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does drug Gabapentin reduce flushing and erythema associated with rosacea? * What medical problems do participants have when taking drug Gabapentin? Researchers will compare Gabapentin to a positive control (minocycline plus hydroxychloroquine, a first-line treatment for rosacea) to see if drug Gabapentin works to reduce flushing and erythema associated with rosacea
Interventions
DRUGminocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine
Patients with rosacea were collected and randomly divided into three groups for treatment, one group was treated with minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, one group was treated with gabapentin 300mg Bid, and the other group was treated with gabapentin 300mg tid. Before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment, the patient's condition score was statistically analyzed, and the efficacy and difference of each group were observed
DRUGgabapentin 300mg bid
Patients with rosacea were collected and randomly divided into three groups for treatment, one group was treated with minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, one group was treated with gabapentin 300mg Bid, and the other group was treated with gabapentin 300mg tid. Before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment, the patient's condition score was statistically analyzed, and the efficacy and difference of each group were observed
DRUGgabapentin 300mg tid
Patients with rosacea were collected and randomly divided into three groups for treatment, one group was treated with minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, one group was treated with gabapentin 300mg Bid, and the other group was treated with gabapentin 300mg tid. Before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment, the patient's condition score was statistically analyzed, and the efficacy and difference of each group were observed
Sponsors
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Initial treatment in our hospital; ② Diagnosed by two experienced dermatologists and in accordance with the updated diagnostic criteria of the National Rosacea Society (NRS) Expert Committee \[38\], unconscious disorder and no communication disorder; ③ did not receive any other form of treatment within 4 weeks; ④ Patients who were followed up for 8 weeks or more and had complete clinical data; ⑤ Informed consent was signed before treatment, and the clinical data were agreed to be used for scientific research
Exclusion criteria
① received other treatment within 4 weeks of this treatment; ② facial flushing caused by other diseases and local irritation; ③ Patients with contraindication to minocycline, hydroxychloroquine, gabapentin and carvedilol; ④ Unable to complete follow-up and serum specimen collection; ○5 patients were intolerant to minocycline, hydroxychloroquine and carvedilol; ○6 Lactation, pregnancy, liver and kidney dysfunction, psychiatric diseases, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus and other systemic diseases.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| the score of CEA ( Clinician Erythema Assessment ) | 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks after treatment | The reduction of the CEA score was compared before treatment, 4 weeks and 8 weeks, 12 weeks after treatment. The CEA score was assessed by a scale, 0 = clear, 1= almost clear, 2 =Mild, 3= Moderate,4= Severe. |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed