Skip to content

Extended vs. No Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy. DISSECTION 2.0.

Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection vs. No Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy in PSMA PET Negative Staged Men: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06776172
Enrollment
400
Registered
2025-01-15
Start date
2025-02-10
Completion date
2040-02-29
Last updated
2025-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancers, Prostate Cancer Surgery

Keywords

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

Brief summary

The aim of the DISSECTION 2.0 study is to determine whether extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) provides a therapeutic benefit for high-risk prostate cancer patients by improving cancer staging and potentially removing micrometastatic disease, ultimately improving their outcomes.

Detailed description

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men globally and a major cause of cancer deaths in Europe. For men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) and a life expectancy of over 10 years, radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard treatment. It improves survival compared to conservative management. However, there is debate about de benefit of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), the removal of lymph nodes in the pelvis, during RP. While PLND can be omitted in low risk PCa patients, extended PLND (ePLND) is recommended in PCa patients at high-risk for recurrence in order to improve nodal staging The DISSECTION 2.0 study aims to investigate whether extended PLND (ePLND) provides additional benefits for men with high-risk PCa. The hypothesis is that ePLND might help by removing undetectable cancer cells (micrometastases) in the lymph nodes or by better staging the disease for treatment planning. While imaging techniques like PSMA-PET are good at detecting cancer spread, they still miss approximately 60% of cancer-bearing lymph nodes, leaving room for ePLND to potentially improve outcomes. ePLND involves removing more lymph nodes than standard PLND, leading to better detection of cancer spread. However, it also increases surgery time and complications slightly, though serious complications are rare.

Interventions

PROCEDUREExtended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

Extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without pelvic lymph node dissection

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years and life expectancy \>15 years * Any biopsy-proven WHO/ISUP grade groups III-V PCa * High-risk prostate cancer defined as: * Any biopsy-proven WHO/ISUP grade group III-V PCa or * ISUP grade group II and PSA \> 20 ng/ml * PSMA-PET: negative staging for regional and distant metastasis * multidisciplinary tumorboard recommendation for radical prostatectomy * WHO performance status 0-1 * Adequate condition (ASA ≤ III) for general anesthesia and RP

Exclusion criteria

* ISUP grade group I PCa and cT1 or cT2 (MRI) * cT4 (MRI) PCa * PSMA-PET: positive staging for local and distant metastasis * Any prior neoadjuvant, local or systemic treatment for PCa * Previous PLND or pelvic radiotherapy * Patients with a prior malignancy and treated with curative intention are eligible if all treatment of that malignancy was completed at least 2 years before registration and the patient has no evidence of disease at registration. Less than 2 years is acceptable for malignancies with low risk of recurrence and/or no late recurrence. * Any other serious underlying medical, psychiatric, psychological, familial, or geographical * condition, which in the judgment of the investigator may interfere with the planned * staging, treatment and follow-up, which affect patient compliance or place the patient at * high risk from treatment-related complications. * Vulnerable men (participants incapable of judgment or participants under tutelage) will not be included in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) persistence3 month (+/- 2 weeks) postoperativelydefined as failure to reach a PSA value of \<0.1 ng/ml
Biochemical recurrence free survival (BCRFS)within 24 months post surgerytime from randomization to biochemical recurrence, defined as serum PSA level ≥ 0.2 ng/ml

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Initiation time of adjuvant or salvage therapiespostoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 yearsCalculated from randomization to the start of any adjuvant or salvage therapy. Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) to the prostatic fossa only excluding lymphatics and without androgen deprivation therapy) will not count as an event for this endpoint if: * A PSMA-PET-computed tomography prior to SRT was negative for disease beyond the prostatic fossa, and * the SRT led to a PSA \<0.1 ng/ml (PSAP) or ≤ 0.2 ng/ml (biochemical recurrence-free survival, BCRFS), respectively.
Time to loco-regional recurrencefrom randomization to end of study at 10-15 yearsCalculated from randomization until the first local (prostate bed) or regional (within the extent of the ePLND template) recurrence.
Localization of progressionfrom randomization to end of study at 10-15 yearsProstate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET)
Time to distant metastasispostoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 yearsCalculated from randomization until the first occurrence of distant metastasis.
Overall survivalpostoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 yearsdeath from any cause
Intraoperative complicationsduring surgeryDocumented using the CLASSintra classification
Postoperative complicationspostoperative up to 10-15 yearsAssessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification
Adverse events (AEs) related to ePLNDpostoperative up to 10-15 yearsCategorized according to CTCAE version 5.0
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)postoperative up to 10-15 yearstracked using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 questionnaire Score 1-100 (100 indicates best quality of life score)
Prostate cancer-specific survivalpostoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 yearsdeath due to prostate cancer
PSA persistence (PSAP) above detection limitpostoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 yearscut-off ≥ 0.03 ng/ml

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of risk prediction for nodal invasionpostoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 yearsfrom prostate biopsy results
Evaluation of the potential value of unilateral ePLNDpostoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 years

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactCyrill Rentsch, Prof. Dr. med.
cyrill.rentsch@usb.ch+41 61 26 87122

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026