Skip to content

Equivalence Study Comparing a Cost-Effective PC-Based Ultrasound Training Tool to Traditional Simulators in Third-Year Medical Students

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Cost-Effective PC-Based Tool as a Non-Inferior Alternative to Traditional Ultrasound Simulators in Medical Education

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06775899
Enrollment
408
Registered
2025-01-15
Start date
2024-03-04
Completion date
2024-04-26
Last updated
2025-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Medical Student, Medical Training, Simulation Based Learning, Ultrasound

Keywords

Medical Education, Ultrasound Simulation, PC-Based Training Tool, Thoracic Ultrasound, Abdominal Ultrasound, Cost-effective Simulator, Clinical Skills Development

Brief summary

Brief Summary: The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if a cost-effective, PC-based ultrasound training tool is as effective as a traditional, medium-cost ultrasound simulator for teaching third-year medical students thoracic and abdominal ultrasound skills. This study focuses on improving access to high-quality ultrasound training in educational settings with limited resources. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does the PC-based tool help participants improve their ability to optimize ultrasound images in a way comparable to the traditional simulator? 2. Can participants using the PC-based tool identify and interpret pathological conditions with the same accuracy as those using the traditional simulator? Participants are third-year medical students enrolled in a structured internship. They will: 1. Watch educational videos covering key concepts in thoracic and abdominal ultrasound imaging. 2. Rotate through training stations where they will practice using either the PC-based tool or the traditional simulator. 3. Perform hands-on exercises with healthy volunteers to practice image acquisition and recognition of anatomical structures. 4. Complete pre- and post-training assessments to measure their progress in skills such as image optimization and identifying pathological conditions. This study aims to explore whether a low-cost digital solution can provide equal educational value, offering a practical alternative to traditional simulators in resource-limited settings.

Interventions

DEVICEPC-Based Ultrasound Training Tool

An interactive, PowerPoint-based PC tool designed to simulate pathology recognition and ultrasound image optimization for medical students. It provides real ultrasound videos and images, allowing students to practice diagnostic interpretation and image acquisition in a structured training format.

DEVICETraditional Ultrasound Simulator (VausSim)

A medium-cost ultrasound simulator used for hands-on training in thoracic and abdominal ultrasound. It allows medical students to practice probe handling, image acquisition, and pathology recognition in a controlled simulation environment.

Sponsors

University of Turin, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Third-year medical students enrolled in the Approach to Ultrasound internship. * Participants who have completed the preliminary blended learning videos on thoracic and abdominal ultrasound techniques. * Participants with or without prior minimal experience in using an ultrasound probe, provided they have not undergone formal specialized ultrasound training.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to attend all training sessions and assessments as per the study schedule. * Physical or medical conditions that limit the ability to perform hands-on ultrasound practice (e.g., musculoskeletal injuries). * Refusal to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in Image Optimization SkillsMeasured immediately before and after the training session.Change in the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scores for image optimization pre- and post-training.
Pathology Recognition AccuracyMeasured immediately before and after the training session.Change in the ability to identify and interpret pathological ultrasound images, scored on a scale of 0-3 (0 = no recognition, 3 = full recognition).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant Satisfaction with TrainingMeasured immediately after the training session.Participant satisfaction assessed through a Likert-scale questionnaire (1-5, where 5 = very satisfied).
Time Required for Image AcquisitionMeasured immediately before and after the training session.Change in the time taken to acquire specific ultrasound views in healthy volunteers and pathology recognition (measured in seconds).

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026