Skip to content

Neuronal Activation Accuracy in Closed-loop Spinal Cord Stimulation

Assessment of Neuronal Activation Accuracy and Stimulation Sensation in Patients with Closed-loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (CL-SCS) Therapy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06775535
Acronym
NAA
Enrollment
12
Registered
2025-01-15
Start date
2023-08-02
Completion date
2029-12-31
Last updated
2025-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Neuropathic Pain, Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2

Brief summary

Observational, prospective, single-center to assess neuronal activation accuracy and stimulation sensation in patients with closed-loop spinal cord stimulation therapy.

Detailed description

The study follow patients with chronic pain who received an EvokeTM spinal cord stimulator. The main aim of this study is to evaluate what influence different settings on nerve activation have and how this affects patients' sensation.

Interventions

DEVICEECAP-controlled, closed-loop SCS

Spinal cord stimulation that measures and records evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) and automatically adjusts the stimulation current to maintain a consistent ECAP amplitude

Sponsors

Karel Hanssens
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is deemed a suitable candidate for SCS trial and permanent implant and has been routinely scheduled to undergo an SCS trial phase with the Evoke SCS System. * Subject has a minimum of pain intensity of 5/10 on the numeric rating scale (NRS) at baseline * Subject is ≥ 18 years old. * Subject is not pregnant or nursing. * Subject is willing and capable of giving informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject currently has an active implantable device including pacemakers, spinal cord stimulator or intrathecal drug delivery system. * Subject is incapable of understanding or responding to the study questionnaires. * Subject is incapable of understanding or operating the patient programmer handset.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with change in stimulation sensation6-monthsStimulation sensation will be characterized by study participants as better, worse or same for 5 different closed-loop sensitivity settings.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NRSBaseline, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months post-implantThe numeric rating scale (NRS) is a pain screening tool. It is used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale. Zero meaning no pain and 10 meaning the worst pain imaginable.
Number of participants with reduced pain distributionBaseline, 3-months, 6-months and 12-months post-implantPain distribution will be assessed by showing a visual representation of the body that enables participants to indicate the locations of their pain.
Paraesthesia mapping3-months, 6-months and 12-months post-implantParaesthesia mapping will be assessed by showing a visual representation of the body that enables participants to indicate the locations where they feel paraesthesia.

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactKarel Hanssens, Dr.
ctc.pijn@azdelta.be0032 51 23 69 12

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026