Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition, Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibitions
Conditions
Keywords
AMI, ALLYANE, low frequency sounds, motor imagery
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical study is to determine the effectiveness of restoring muscle strength in the management of motor inhibition when complemented by the ALLYANE process (neuro-motor reprogramming) compared to a standard management approach. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the ALLYANE process lead to greater muscle strength gains compared to standard care? * Is there a functional benefit when standard management is complemented by the ALLYANE process? The investigators will compare the group receiving standard care complemented by ALLYANE to a group receiving only standard care to evaluate if the ALLYANE process provides additional effects. Participants will: * Undergo assessments of muscle strength. * Receive either standard management or standard management with ALLYANE. * Complete functional evaluations before and after treatment.
Detailed description
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of motor inhibition management using two different approaches: standard management alone and standard management supplemented by the ALLYANE neuro-motor reprogramming process. To ensure robust and reliable results, the study proposes enrolling a total of 120 patients, divided into two groups of 60 patients each.
Interventions
OTHERA session combining motor imagery and listening to low frequency sounds
Prospective study of the efficacy of the Allyane procedure after knee sprain
Active extension (e.g. by lateral raising of the quadriceps, strengthening of the quadriceps) quadriceps)
Sponsors
Orthopedic Center Santy, Lyon, France
Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité
Allyane
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Men and women aged 18 to 35 years * No neurological history * Have had a primary knee sprain * Present with VMO lateralisation with or without the presence of flessum * Quadricipital weakness between the healthy and injured limb of 50% or more as measured by a portable dynamometer * Member of a social security scheme
Exclusion criteria
* Recurrent sprain * Bilateral sprain * Persons under guardianship, trusteeship or any other measure depriving them of their rights or liberty, and adults protected by law. * Persons who do not understand French * Knee trauma other than sprain *
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Muscle activity | Before and 3 weeks after conventional therapy | Electromyography (EMG) during maximal voluntary isometric contraction of leg extension. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Strength | Before and 3 weeks after conventional therapy | Dynamometer during maximal voluntary isometric contraction of leg extension. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Lysholm Questionnaire | Before and 3 weeks after conventional therapy. | A self-administered survey used to evaluate knee function and stability. |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed