Skip to content

Introduction of Mycotic Prophylaxis At Cystectomy Trial.

IMPACT - the Introduction of Mycotic Prophylaxis At Cystectomy Trial. Perioperative Mycotic Prophylaxis to Reduce Postoperative Complications Following Cystectomy - a Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06770530
Acronym
IMPACT
Enrollment
484
Registered
2025-01-13
Start date
2024-06-24
Completion date
2027-09-30
Last updated
2025-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystectomy

Brief summary

This study aims to introduce a perioperative antifungal prophylaxis for patients undergoing cystectomy: surgically removal of the urinary bladder with construction of a urinary diversion. We wish to investigate the effect of antifungal prophylaxis on complications after the operation.

Detailed description

Cystectomy with construction of a urinary diversion, is a major cancer surgery and one of the most complex surgeries in the urological specialty. After cystectomy, the most commonly performed urinary diversion is an ileal conduit, where a section of the terminal ileum is shunted out and connected to the upper urinary tract and a stoma is created. During this procedure, the abdominal cavity is exposed to bacteria and fungus from the ileum. Besides the perioperative contamination, micro-leakage in relation to the anastomosis is suspected to contribute to a local infectious response that may result in postoperative complications as ileal paralysis. Paralytic ileus is a serious complication that affects many patients after cystectomy, resulting in a prolonged length of stay, low quality of life postoperatively, and increased risk of complications such as aspiration, pneumonia, wound rupture, deep venous thrombosis, undernourishment and infections. Current guidelines support the use of perioperative antibiotics targeting gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, typically administered as broad-spectrum medicine such as piperacillin/tazobactam or cephalosporins. Regarding fungal infections, emerging data show that 48% of the patients undergoing RC have candida albicans in samples from the terminal ileum. Also, it is well known that fungal infections are highly prevalent in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery where it is associated with a high risk of mortality. Small retrospective studies suggest that the addition of antifungal medicine to perioperative antibiotics can reduce the risk of bowel- and infectious complications after abdominal surgery. The compelling theoretical and clinical rationale for addition of antifungal prophylaxis to standard-of-care antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing radical cystectomy provides the basis for initiation of a randomized clinical trial representing the highest level of evidence.

Interventions

DRUGFluconazole

400 mg inravenous Fluconazole, single dose 200 ml

Intravenous saline solution, single dose 200 ml

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients 18 years and older * Willingness to participate in the study and the ability to understand and sign an informed consent * Indication for performing cystectomy * The urinary diversion is limited to the ileal conduit

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with contraindications to Fluconazole. This includes allergies and treatment with non-pausable medication that in combination is contraindicated * Patients in active treatment for mycotic infections

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative complications90 days from surgeryMeasured by Clavien Dindo III-V classification score. The Clavien Dindo Classification is used to rank the severity of a surgical complication. It consists of seven grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb, V) with I being any deviation from the normal postoperative course and V being death of a patient.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to gastrointestinal functionPostoperatively within 90 daysFirst bowel movement
Nasogastric tube placementPostoperatively within 90 daysNumber of nasogastric tube placements
Length of stay (LOS)90 days from surgeryDuration (days) of primary hospitalization.
Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH)90 days from surgeryNumber of days alive and out of hospital within 90 days from surgery
Quality of life (QoL): EORTC QLQ-C30Before operation and 90 days after surgeryQuestionnaire from EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. The questionnaires consists of a global health status (high score represents high quality of life), a functional scale (a high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning) and a symptom scale (a high score represents a high level of symptomatology/problems).
Quality of Life(QOL): EORTC QLQ-BLM30Before operation and 90 days afterQuestionnaire from EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. The questionnaires consists of a global health status (high score represents high quality of life), a functional scale (a high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning) and a symptom scale (a high score represents a high level of symptomatology/problems).
Readmission rate90 days after surgeryNumber of readmissions

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactMie Ynddal, MD
mie.skjoettgaard.ynddal@regionh.dk+4535456152

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026