Skip to content

Investigating the Localization of Consciousness Through Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: Anterior Vs. Posterior Cortex Debate

Exploring the Origin of Consciousness Through Disorders of Consciousness: a PET Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06770348
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-01-13
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2025-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Disorders of Consciousness

Keywords

disorders of consciousness, MCS, PET, UWS

Brief summary

Patients enrolled in the study underwent five assessments using the CRS-R(Coma Recovery Scale-Revised) within 10 days, along with an 18F-FDG-PET scan.

Detailed description

Patients enrolled in the study underwent five assessments using the CRS-R (Coma Recovery Scale-Revised) within 10 days, along with an 18F-FDG-PET (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography) scan. The CRS-R evaluations were conducted by professionally trained and highly experienced personnel. During the CRS-R assessments, patients' behavioral responses were recorded in the domains of visual, auditory, motor, oromotor/verbal, communication, and arousal. Based on the optimal CRS-R results obtained within the 10-day period, patients were categorized into MCS (Minimally consciousness state, criteria: consistent command-following, reproducible responses to commands, object recognition, intelligible verbalization, partially accurate communication, object localization, visual pursuit and visual object localization, spontaneous motor responses, object manipulation, and/or localization to noxious stimulation) or UWS (Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, criteria: preserved wakefulness accompanied by behavioral responses such as localization to sound, auditory startle, visual startle, withdrawal/flexion movements, abnormal posturing, vocalizations/oromotor movements, and reflexive oromotor responses). All patients exhibited stable vital signs. For data analysis, a healthy control group from Belgium was included to compare brain metabolism between patients with disorders of consciousness and healthy individuals.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hangzhou Normal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 81 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of disorders of consciousness after 5 CRS-R assessments; * Age \>18 years; * Stable vital signs; * No use of sedatives or neuromuscular blockers within 24 hours prior to enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

* Acute-phase patients (injury duration \<28 days); * Fewer than 5 CRS-R assessments completed within 10 days; * Patients diagnosed with EMCS (Emerging Minimally Conscious State); * Patients with unclear diagnoses (cases where experienced evaluators could not reach a consensus diagnosis); * Patients with persistent seizures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brain metabolism in patients with disorders of consciousness was measured by 18F-FDG-PETFrom enrollment to the end of CRS-R assessment in 10 daysPatients were assessed using the CRS-R (Coma Recovery Scale-Revised) five times within 10 days, and an 18F-FDG-PET scan was performed. The assessors for the CRS-R evaluations were professionally trained and highly experienced. During the CRS-R assessment, the patients' behavioral performance in the areas of visual, auditory, motor, oromotor/speech, communication, and arousal were recorded. The patient's best CRS-R assessment score within the 10-day period was used to classify them into MCS (Minimally Conscious State) and UWS (Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome).

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026