Ventricular Arrhythmia, Ventricular Tachycardia (V-Tach)
Conditions
Keywords
Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR), Malignant ventricular Tachycardia, Ventricular Tachycardia Storm, Radiotherapy, Proton Therapy
Brief summary
Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are the leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) worldwide. The implantable defibrillator (ICD) increases survival in patients at risk of VA, with data of superiority to antiarrhythmic drugs. Nevertheless, the ICD cannot prevent VAs, and shocks delivered by the device (appropriate and inappropriate) negatively impact patients' quality of life. Transcatheter ablation (TCA) is the percutaneous therapy that can eliminate VAs and prevent any recurrence. TCA is the state of the art for the treatment of drug-unresponsive VAs in patients with structural heart disease, but the prevalence of recurrence remains high (between 30% and 60%). For these reasons, several reports have recently appeared in the literature proposing a new solution for the treatment of VAs in which the use of external-beam body radiotherapy with stereotactic-radiosurgical technique (SBRT) is described. SBRT represents a rapid, noninvasive approach based on the delivery of high radiation doses of photons (25 Gy in a single fraction) to a precise location in cardiac tissue. SBRT has entered the latest 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on VAs as a bailout therapy. Based on preliminary data in the oncology setting, proton therapy could allow further optimization of compliance of these therapeutic doses by preserving even more of the healthy heart part and thus reducing the cardiopulmonary toxicity of radiotherapy outside the ablation target. The investigators therefore propose an experimental (prospective interventional) study to evaluate the toxicity (primary endpoint) and efficacy (secondary endpoint) of proton radiosurgery for the treatment of VA with an enrollment of 21 patients. The primary endpoint is to evaluate the toxicity of proton radiotherapy in the acute phase (during the first 30 days of the procedure) and at 3, 6 and 12 months. A crucial part of the protocol will be the proper definition of the target to be irradiated, which will require the integration of different non-invasive cardiac imaging methodologies such as CT (Computed Tomography), MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) and PET (Positron Emission Tomography), coupled with invasive and/or non-invasive body surface mapping with multi-electrode electrocardiogram (ECG) so as to obtain a cardiac image in which the myocardial scar and the arrhythmogenic region are fused.
Interventions
RADIATIONStereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) with Proton Therapy
STAR with a single dose of 25Gy(RBE) Proton Therapy
Sponsors
Università degli Studi di Trento
Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Provincia Autonoma di Trento
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. age ≥ 40 years 2. carrier of ICD/CRT-D or S-ICD 3. episodes of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation requiring defibrillator intervention (shock or ATP) which are: * refractory to maximal drug therapy; * recurrent (at least 3 episodes in the previous 6 months); 4. patients with contraindications to a conventional ablative strategy, in relation to the high risk associated with the procedure due to the severity of the heart disease and/or the presence of comorbidities or patients who have already undergone ablation, in the presence of an arrhythmogenic substrate refractory to or unsuitable for an interventional approach or patients who refuse transcatheter ablative attempts due to high intraoperative risk in relation to the patient's characteristics. 5. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 20%.
Exclusion criteria
1. inability to express informed consent 2. previous thoracic radiotherapy (RT) with cardiac involvement 3. active myocardial ischemia 4. recent cardiac revascularization (\< 120 days) 5. hemodynamic instability (cardiogenic shock, NYHA class IV) 6. contraindication to radiosurgery (e.g., due to artifacts or other technical reasons) 7. lack of patient cooperation in pre-procedural investigations 8. ICD malfunction 9. severe comorbidity with prognosis \< 12 months 10. pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Toxicity of STAR with a single dose of 25Gy(RBE) applied with Proton Therapy | Recording of MAEs for the first 24 months after therapy | The primary endpoint will be the assessment of the toxicity of proton therapy and will be evaluated in the acute phase (during the first 30 days of the procedure) and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The incidence of Major Adverse Events (MAEs) related to, or presumed to be related, to proton therapy ablation will be assessed as percentage of patients with events compared to the total enrolled. The definition of MAEs (for the primary endpoint of the study) is identical to that of SAEs (as defined for reporting under Good Clinical Practice (GCP)) and can be found in the section Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) / Major Adverse Events (MAEs) of the study protocol. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy of STAR with a single dose of 25Gy(RBE) applied with Proton Therapy | Efficacy measures will be recorded for the first 24 months after therapy | The main secondary endpoint will be the efficacy endpoint, which will involve evaluating the procedural effectiveness of therapy at 3, 6 and 12, 18 and 24 months and is the percentage reduction in VT/VF (Ventricular Tachycardia/Ventricular Fibrillation) episodes occurring after the 2-month blanking period, compared with the period before the proton ablation procedure (6 months). VT episodes will be classified as follows: * VT episodes \> 30 s, regardless of ICD intervention * ICD interventions on VT episodes by antitachycardia pacing (without shock delivery) * ICD interventions with appropriate DC shocks * Number of subjects with ≥ 50% reduction in the number of ICD treatments for VT (shock or antitachycardia pacing, ATP) comparing the 6-month period before proton therapy with the 8 months after proton therapy (excluding the 2-month blanking period after Proton Therapy). In addition, a series of other secondary toxicity and efficacy endpoints will be evaluated. |
Countries
Italy
Contacts
Primary ContactMaurizio Del Greco, M.D.
Backup ContactFrank RH Lohr, M.D.
Outcome results
None listed