Skip to content

Effect of Lidocaine and Ozone in Injection for Myofascial Pain

Comparison of the Efficacy of Lidocaine and Ozone in Masticatory Muscle Injections for Patients With Myofascial Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06768281
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-01-10
Start date
2021-03-25
Completion date
2024-09-27
Last updated
2025-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myofascial Pain Syndromes

Keywords

ozone, lidocaine, Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Brief summary

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a chronic soft tissue rheumatism characterized by tense, painful muscle bands, known as trigger points, located within the muscle or fascia. These trigger points typically lead to pain during movement, limiting muscle extension and reducing mobility. While various treatments exist for MPS, the most common approach is injecting local anesthetic agents directly into the trigger points to relieve pain. Recently, systemic and local ozone therapy has also gained popularity as an alternative treatment for MPS. Ozone can be injected directly into muscles in areas such as the back and waist to target pain and inflammation. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of ozone therapy with lidocaine injection in patients diagnosed with MPS.The aim of this study was to compare 2% non-vasoconstrictor lidocaine and ozone injections in the treatment of patients presenting to the clinic with myofascial pain syndrome and to determine the more therapeutic method.

Detailed description

60 patients between the ages of 18-65 diagnosed with MPS were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into four groups. As the control group, the first group was injected with isotonic saline, the second group was injected with 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor, the third group was injected with ozone gas and the fourth group was injected with ozonated isotonic saline. Patients were evaluated with VAS score before treatment, at 1, 2, 4 weeks and 3 months after treatment. In addition, quality of life was evaluated with HIT-6 and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scales before treatment and at the 1st and 3rd months after treatment.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHeadache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6)

Patients who had injections were asked to mark their headache severities with a survey includes six questions about their past 4 weeks. The test applied preoperatively, postoperatively 1st and 3rd months.

Patients who had injections were asked to reply some questions about their sleeping habits for past 4 weeks. The test applied preoperatively, postoperatively 1st and 3rd months.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTVisual Analogue Score (VAS)

Patients who had injections are asked to state their pain with a 10 cm visual analogue scale preoperatively and postoperatively 1st,2nd weeks and 1st and 3rd months.

OTHERMasseter muscle injection

1 ml of insulin needle with a 27-gauge ½ inch 13 mm needle tip will be injected into up to 4 trigger points in the taut bands that cause the most pain in the masseter muscle. Injections were done at most 3 times. As the control group, the first group was injected with isotonic saline; the second group was injected with 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor; the third group with ozone gas; and the fourth group with ozonated isotonic saline.

Sponsors

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Yağmur Malkoc
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* No temporomandibular joint treatment within the last year. * Presence of palpable trigger points in the unilateral/bilateral masseter muscle. * Classified as ASA 1 or ASA 2. * Chronic pain in the masseter muscle for at least the past three months. * Presence of at least two palpable trigger points in the unilateral or bilateral masseter muscle, with a pain score of ≥ 3 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) upon palpation

Exclusion criteria

* History of allergy to any anesthetic agent. * Use of anticoagulant medications. * Use of analgesics, muscle relaxants, or antidepressants within the last month. * Diagnosed with specific conditions such as migraine, neuromuscular junction disorders, fibromyalgia, depression, or schizophrenia. * History of trauma, tumor, or surgery in the head-neck region. * Presence of skin infection in the relevant area.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1. The pain assessment after injectionsThree monthsThe primary outcome was the Visual Analog Score (VAS), a simple tool that allows the patient to express pain visually and numerically and is particularly effective in measuring subjective sensations. The patient is asked to choose a number between 0 and 10 indicating the pain level, with 0 indicating the least pain and 10 indicating the most pain.
2. Headache evaluation after injectionsThree monthsThe second outcome was the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), which is used to assess headaches. 6 indicates the lowest score, and 13 indicates the highest score.
3. Sleep quality evaluation after injectionsThree monthsThe third outcome was the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), consists of 7 main components and a total of 19 questions. Each component is scored from 0 to 3; the total PSQI score ranges from 0 to 21. High scores indicate a decrease in quality of life while descending scores indicate an increase.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026