Skip to content

SecondarY Prevention and maNagement of Myocardial Injury aftER Noncardiac surGerY (SYNERGY) Pilot Trial

A Pilot Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention Therapies in Patients Who Had a Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery to Prevent Major Cardiovascular Events

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06768034
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-01-10
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2027-11-01
Last updated
2026-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery (MINS)

Keywords

Noncardiac surgery, Secondary cardiovascular prevention, Randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

Cardiac complications, particularly myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS), significantly contribute to 30-day mortality, affecting about 1 in 10 patients after noncardiac surgery. Despite its prevalence and serious implications, there is no consensus on managing myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery in clinical practice. Interventions commonly used for cardiovascular prevention in patients who had a heart attack outside of a surgery context could also be beneficial in patient with MINS. This pilot study trial aims to gather feasibility data, such as recruitment rates and intervention adherence that will guide on the design and inform on sample size of a future study with large pragmatic randomized controlled trial on the impact of systematic referral for secondary cardiovascular prevention on outcomes in patients who had a MINS.

Detailed description

The SYNERGY study is a pilot randomized controlled trial with 100 patients who had myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS). Patients are assigned to either a control group receiving usual care or an intervention group that receives referral to a specialist for implementations of interventions on secondary cardiovascular prevention. Secondary cardiovascular prevention will be individualized to the patient's risk factors and may include antiplatelet agents, cholesterol-lowering treatment, blood pressure-lowering medication, as well as counselling on healthy lifestyle choices on diet and exercise, including, if applicable, optimization of diabetes treatment and help in quitting smoking. At six months, follow-up will assess clinical cardiovascular outcomes, medication adherence, smoking status, adherence to a Mediterranean diet and physical activity. Key feasibility metrics include recruitment rate, intervention adherence, crossover in the control group, and changes physical activity and dietary pattern. This study aims to address untreated myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery by collecting feasibility data to inform on the design of a future large randomized clinical trials on secondary cardiovascular prevention.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIntervention Group

Patients being referred to an internist or cardiologist after myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery

Sponsors

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Lead SponsorOTHER
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Have undergone noncardiac surgery, 2. Had a myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery with a presumed ischemic mechanism and without an overt nonischemic precipitating etiology (e.g., sepsis) 3. Provide written informed consent to participate in the SYNERGY pilot trial.

Exclusion criteria

1. already on 2 of 3 secondary cardiovascular prevention medications (i.e., antiplatelet, statin, and/or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) 2. patients with contraindication to statins (i.e., decompensated or Child-Pugh C cirrhosis, acute liver failure, elevated AST/ALT greater than 2-fold the normal upper limit, previous demonstrated statin hypersensitivity, allergy, or statin-related myopathy); 3. patients with contraindication to antiplatelet therapy (i.e., active or recent \<1-month peptic ulcer disease, esophageal or gastric variceal disease, history of intracranial or intraspinal hemorrhage, significant thrombocytopenia with platelet count \<50 × 109/L), 4. patients with contraindication to ACEI and ARB therapy (i.e, hypersensitivity or allergy to ACEI or ARB); 5. Previously enrolled in the SYNERGY pilot trial, 6. Considered unreliable or unable to complete the trial procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average recruitment rate12 monthsAverage number of patients recruited per month. Feasibility is defined as average recruitment rate ≥3 patients/month/site as "trial feasible", between 1-2 patients/month/site as "potentially feasible with protocol modifications", and \<1 patient/month/site as "unlikely feasible".
Proportion adherence to referral to specialized cardiovascular care in the intervention group6 monthsDefined as the proportion of patients allocated to the intervention group with referral to internal medicine or cardiology within 6 weeks of MINS. The adherence feasibility outcome is defined as follows: ≥70% as "trial feasible", between 40-69% "potentially feasible with protocol modifications", and \<40% "unlikely feasible".
Proportion crossover to referral to specialized CV care in the control group6 monthsDefined as the proportion of patients allocated to the control group with referral to internal medicine or cardiology within 6 weeks of MINS. The crossover feasibility outcome is defined as follows: \<30% as "trial feasible", between 30-49% "potentially feasible with protocol modifications", and \>50% "unlikely feasible".

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of prescription of cardiovascular medications6 monthsProportion of patients who are prescribed an antiplatelet, statin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) (all three) at 6 months.
Proportion of patients on antiplatelet therapy6 monthsProportion of patients who are prescribed an antiplatelet therapy.
Proportion of patients on statin therapy6 monthsProportion of patients who are prescribed a statin.
Proportion of patients on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)6 monthsProportion of patients who are prescribed an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB).
Proportion consent of eligible patients12 monthsProportion of eligible patients which consented to participate in the trial
Proportion of completeness to follow-up6 monthsProportion of patients enrolled in the trial that completed the 6-month follow-up
Change in IPAQ score6 monthsDifference in physical activity score (i.e., the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF) score in metabolic equivalents (METs) minute per week) between baseline and 6 months, expressed as a continuous outcome, with higher values meaning a larger increase in physical activity level.
Change in MEDAS score6 monthsDifference between the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) questionnaire score at baseline and 6 months (score between 0 and 14, with high score reflecting higher adherence).
Proportion of major cardiovascular events6 monthsProportion of patients who experience any of the following composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and coronary revascularization.
Proportion of cardiovascular death6 monthsProportion of patients with a cardiovascular death is defined as any death with a cardiovascular cause and includes those deaths following a myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac arrest, stroke, cardiac revascularization procedure (i.e., percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery), and heart failure.
Proportion of myocardial infarction6 monthsProportion of patients with a myocardial infarction as defined according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.
Proportion of non-fatal cardiac arrest6 monthsProportion of patients with a nonfatal cardiac arrest defined as successful resuscitation from either documented or presumed ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, asystole, or pulseless electrical activity requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation, pharmacological therapy, or cardiac defibrillation.
Proportion of coronary revascularization6 monthsProportion of patients with a cardiac revascularization procedures including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary arterial bypass grafting (CABG).
Proportion of stroke6 monthsProportion of patients with a stroke defined as either: 1. a new focal neurological deficit thought to be vascular in origin with signs or symptoms lasting more than 24 hours or leading to death, OR 2. a new focal neurological deficit thought to be vascular in origin with signs or symptoms lasting less 24 hours with a positive neuroimaging consistent with a stroke.
Proportion of transient ischemic attack6 monthsProportion of patients with a transient ischemic attack defined as rapidly developed and transient clinical signs of focal or global disturbance of cerebral function, lasting less than 24 hours, with either 1) direct weighted magnetic resonance findings of acute brain ischemic lesions, or 2) high risk neurologic features (i.e., lateralizing weakness and/or speech disruption lasting \>5 min).
Proportion of heart failure6 monthsProportion of patients with a diagnosis of heart fialure, as defined by (criteria A and B required): A. New or worsening symptoms due to heart failure (HF), including at least ONE of the following: 1\. Shortness of breath (dyspnea with exertion, dyspnea at rest, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea), 2. Decreased exercise tolerance, or 3. Fatigue. B. Signs of new or worsening HF, consisting of at least TWO physical examination findings OR one physical examination finding and at least ONE laboratory (i.e., natriuretic peptide elevation) or radiological imaging.
Proportion of all-cause mortality6 monthsProportion of patients who died of any cause.
Proportion of new significant arrythmia6 monthsProportion of patients with a new significant arrythmia defined as new supraventricular or ventricular arrythmia that results in angina, congestive heart failure, symptomatic hypotension, or that requires oral or intravenous treatment with a rate controlling drug, antiarrhythmic drug, electrical cardioversion, implantation of a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Proportion of major bleeding6 monthsProportion of patients with a major bleeding defined according to the criteria of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) as clinically overt bleeding which was fatal or associated with any of the following: 1. a fall in hemoglobin level of 2 g/dL or more or documented transfusion of at least 2 units of packed red blood cells, 2. involvement of a critical anatomical site (intracranial, spinal, ocular, pericardial, articular, intramuscular with compartment syndrome, retroperitoneal).
Proportion of clinically relevant non-major bleeding6 monthsProportion of patients with a clinically relevant non-major bleeding defined as any sign or symptom of hemorrhage (e.g., more bleeding than would be expected for a clinical circumstance, including bleeding found by imaging alone) that does not fit the criteria for the ISTH definition of major bleeding but does meet at least one of the following criteria: 1. requiring medical intervention by a healthcare professional 2. leading to hospitalization or increased level of care 3. prompting a face to face (i.e., not just a telephone or electronic communication) evaluation
Proprotion of kidney injury6 monthsProportion of patients with a kidney Injury defined by the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) definition and classified according to the following stage: Stage 1: Serum creatinine increase ≥26.5 μmol/l or increase to 1.5-2.0-fold from baseline Stage 2: Serum creatinine increase \>2.0-3.0-fold from baseline Stage 3: Serum creatinine increase \>3.0-fold from baseline or serum creatinine ≥354 μmol/l with an acute increase of at least 44 μmol/l or need for new renal replacement therapy.
Proportion of liver injury6 monthsProportion of patients with a liver injury defined by elevation of ALT and/or AST ≥3 times the upper limit of normal.
Proportion of rhabdomyolysis6 monthsProportion of patients with a rhabdomyolysis defined as muscle symptoms with serum creatinine kinase ≥10 times the upper limit of normal.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTMelodie Boko, MSc
synergy.dri.chum@ssss.gouv.qc.ca514-890-8000
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREmmanuelle Duceppe, MD PhD

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026