Skip to content

Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Appointment Reminder Methods

Comparative Effectiveness of Targeted Outreach With an Automated Caller for Increasing Appointment Completion: A Randomized Quality Improvement Initiative

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06767423
Enrollment
32925
Registered
2025-01-09
Start date
2024-11-05
Completion date
2025-02-05
Last updated
2025-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Appointment Reminders

Brief summary

Penn Medicine is continually trying to optimize operations and decrease number of patients who do not show up for their appointments. This has included new changes to text message reminders, implemented as usual care. At a baseline, less than 75% of scheduled outpatient appointments are actually completed. This results in longer wait times and decreased access for patients and operational inefficiencies. The goal of the project is to test whether supplementing standard text message appointment reminders with targeted outreach using an automated phone call to patients with increased risk of not showing up for their appointment (\>15% per Epic's Risk of Patient No-Show Model) reduces no show rate (the study's primary outcome) and increases patient appointment completion rate (% of appointments that were completed during scheduled appointment time, a secondary outcome). Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the standard text message or standard text message plus the automated caller. Eligible patients have already consented to receiving text message reminders from Penn Medicine and must have an in-person appointment scheduled during the study period. The Access Optimization Group at Penn will be monitoring the randomization and outcomes reporting of whether a patient confirmed, cancelled, or no showed at the scheduled appointment. All eligible outpatient appointments over a two week period will be included in this operational evaluation. The Access Optimization Group will then make a decision on which approach to implement as usual care based on the results of this operational evaluation.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALText Message + Automated Caller (Intervention)

Standard text message appointment reminders to English and Spanish-speaking patients. Text reminders will go out 3-weeks, 3 days, and 24 hours before the appointment. If patient has not confirmed their appointment after the 3-week and 3-day reminders they will receive an automated caller.

Sponsors

M. Kit Delgado, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* in-person appointments * English or Spanish speakers * 18 years old or older

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
No Show RateThrough study completion, on average of 3 weeksProportion of initially scheduled appointments in which the patient did not show.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Appointment Completion RateThrough study completion, on average of 3 weeksProportion of initial scheduled appointments completed.
Appointment Cancelation RateThrough study completion, on average of 3 weeksProportion of initially scheduled appointments cancelled.
Appointment Refill RateThrough study completion, on average of 3 weeksProportion of cancelled appointments that were refilled.
Refilled Appointment Completion RationThrough study completion, on average of 3 weeksProportion of refilled appointments that were completed.
Net Appointment Completion RateThrough study completion, on average of 3 weeksProportion of appointment slots resulting in a completed appointment. Includes completed refilled appointments.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026