Skip to content

Comparative Study on AQP4 Antibody Detection Methods

A Multi-center Comparative Real-World Study on AQP4 Antibody Detection Methods Using Live Cell and Fixed Cell-Based Assay Technologies

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06767020
Enrollment
120
Registered
2025-01-09
Start date
2023-11-11
Completion date
2025-01-27
Last updated
2025-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NMOSD

Keywords

AQP4, Fixed CBA, Live CBA

Brief summary

This study aims to determine which method is more suitable for clinical application by comparing the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of serum AQP4-IgG detection using live cell CBA and fixed cell CBA methods, thereby improving the diagnostic accuracy of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD).

Detailed description

This is a multi-center comparative real-world study on AQP4 Antibody Detection Methods Using Live Cell and Fixed Cell-Based Assay Technologies. This study aims to determine which method is more suitable for clinical application by comparing the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of serum AQP4-IgG detection using live cell CBA and fixed cell CBA methods, thereby improving the diagnostic accuracy of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). One hundred and twenty patients from 3 centres in China will be enrolled.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* NMOSD: Confirm a diagnosis of NMOSD according to 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria by IPND (International Panel for NMO Diagnosis) suspected NMOSD: cases having features suggestive of NMOSD but can not confirm a diagnosis of NMOSD according to 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria by IPND (International Panel for NMO Diagnosis). the following 'high risk' clinical and laboratory features had to be met 1. optic neuritis that was either severe with poor recovery (residual visual acuity in better eye worse or equal to 6/36), bilateral (simultaneous orsequential within 3 months) or recurrent (more than 2 attacks) as the sole clinical manifestation of demyelinating disease, 2. severe transverse myelitis with a central cord syndrome (symmetrical, motor, sensory and bladder involvement) and poor recovery (residual EDSS greater than 5.0) or a longitudinally extensive lesion of the spinal cord spanning 3 or more vertebral segments on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or 3. demyelinating disease clinically confined to the optic nerve and spinal cord with at least one of the following: normal or atypical MRI of the brain (fewer than 2 periventricular lesions), negative oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid, raised CSF protein or a CSF pleocytosis (more than 10 cells per μl) 2.All subjects provided written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* 1.Patients with incomplete clinical information. 2.Patients without serum samples.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity (CI%), Specificity (CI%), Accuracy (CI%), PLR (CI%), NLR (CI%)immediatelyThe sensitivity, 95% confidence interval (CI) for sensitivity, specificity, and 95% CI for specificity of AQP4 antibody detection methods using live cell and fixed cell-based assay technologies in NMOSD and suspected NMOSD, along with the corresponding results from various control groups and overall controls, are given.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Agreement ,Cohen's kappa, Spearman correlation coefficientimmediatelyThe agreement ,Cohen's kappa, Spearman correlation coefficient of serum AQP4 antibody detection results using live CBA and fixed CBA.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026